> On 7 May 2016, at 12:54, Nicklas Karlsson
> wrote:
>
> That's certainly valuable information. Once every 64 seconds or once every
> second is equally bad just harder to find.
The fact that it was exactly every 64 seconds was the clue that prompted
someone on the forum to identify it as SM
> > I have an old server intel Xeon, it is used as a server and I did not try
> > real time kernel yet.
>
>
> I have been running an old Xeon server on my lathe for several years now.
> It's just about OK for latency, but does need the SMI tweak or it throws in
> a big one every 64 seconds.
> ...
