Here is a quick video of some of the different parts
This one is not using the tailstock
https://youtu.be/_3mKA7dri60?si=vafE_I3i054bXf8E
On Thu, 19 Oct 2023, 20:42 andrew beck, wrote:
> Hey guys I think I fixed the issue.
>
> The wear remap is perfect.
>
> The issue was I was using classic
Hey guys I think I fixed the issue.
The wear remap is perfect.
The issue was I was using classic ladder for toolchanger and then also the
remap.
And I think they had timing issues. 1 toolchange out of 500 fails.
I changed to using the carousel component and remaps
I just added to the wear
Yep I'll keep digging and reply back here later
On Fri, 13 Oct 2023, 08:38 andy pugh, wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 19:19, andrew beck
> wrote:
>
> > And also the fact that Linux CNC was showing t3 when t3 was the one
> loaded.
> >
> > Even though the code had gone past the t4 command
>
> If
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 19:19, andrew beck wrote:
> And also the fact that Linux CNC was showing t3 when t3 was the one loaded.
>
> Even though the code had gone past the t4 command
If you can find a recipe to recreate the issue then perhaps there is a
way to investigate what's going on.
--
Hey andy
I just have a pocket sensor home sensor and classic ladder counter.
Plus carousel clamped and unclamped sensors etc.
But I don't think that was the problem.
If that was the case I would expect the offsets to be incorrect.
Eg t4 would be using t3 offsets and try machine in wrong
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 10:33, andrew beck wrote:
>
> No we pushed cycle stop changed a offset by 0.01mm waited 2 minutes then
> restarted whole program from beginning.
Could your observations be explained by the toolchanger position not
being what the system thought it was?
What sort of
No we pushed cycle stop changed a offset by 0.01mm waited 2 minutes then
restarted whole program from beginning.
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023, 21:59 andy pugh, wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 02:41, andrew beck
> wrote:
>
> > We stopped it and then changed a wear offset and it ignored the
> toolchange
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 02:41, andrew beck wrote:
> We stopped it and then changed a wear offset and it ignored the toolchange
> and tried to machine with t3 instead of changing to t4.
Was this with run-from-line? (You say that you stopped it)
Which line did you run from?
--
atp
"A motorcycle
Hey guys. Got a problem with my CNC lathe
It randomally tried to run a program with the wrong tool number.
I'm using the fanucy wear offset patch to get wear offsets as linuxcnc
doesn't offer that yet as stock standard.
This lathe has done about 4000 toolchanges faultlessly.
We stopped it and