Re: [Emc-users] Lathe ignores tool number change using fanucy wear offset patch

2023-10-19 Thread andrew beck
Here is a quick video of some of the different parts This one is not using the tailstock https://youtu.be/_3mKA7dri60?si=vafE_I3i054bXf8E On Thu, 19 Oct 2023, 20:42 andrew beck, wrote: > Hey guys I think I fixed the issue. > > The wear remap is perfect. > > The issue was I was using classic

Re: [Emc-users] Lathe ignores tool number change using fanucy wear offset patch

2023-10-19 Thread andrew beck
Hey guys I think I fixed the issue. The wear remap is perfect. The issue was I was using classic ladder for toolchanger and then also the remap. And I think they had timing issues. 1 toolchange out of 500 fails. I changed to using the carousel component and remaps I just added to the wear

Re: [Emc-users] Lathe ignores tool number change using fanucy wear offset patch

2023-10-12 Thread andrew beck
Yep I'll keep digging and reply back here later On Fri, 13 Oct 2023, 08:38 andy pugh, wrote: > On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 19:19, andrew beck > wrote: > > > And also the fact that Linux CNC was showing t3 when t3 was the one > loaded. > > > > Even though the code had gone past the t4 command > > If

Re: [Emc-users] Lathe ignores tool number change using fanucy wear offset patch

2023-10-12 Thread andy pugh
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 19:19, andrew beck wrote: > And also the fact that Linux CNC was showing t3 when t3 was the one loaded. > > Even though the code had gone past the t4 command If you can find a recipe to recreate the issue then perhaps there is a way to investigate what's going on. --

Re: [Emc-users] Lathe ignores tool number change using fanucy wear offset patch

2023-10-12 Thread andrew beck
Hey andy I just have a pocket sensor home sensor and classic ladder counter. Plus carousel clamped and unclamped sensors etc. But I don't think that was the problem. If that was the case I would expect the offsets to be incorrect. Eg t4 would be using t3 offsets and try machine in wrong

Re: [Emc-users] Lathe ignores tool number change using fanucy wear offset patch

2023-10-12 Thread andy pugh
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 10:33, andrew beck wrote: > > No we pushed cycle stop changed a offset by 0.01mm waited 2 minutes then > restarted whole program from beginning. Could your observations be explained by the toolchanger position not being what the system thought it was? What sort of

Re: [Emc-users] Lathe ignores tool number change using fanucy wear offset patch

2023-10-12 Thread andrew beck
No we pushed cycle stop changed a offset by 0.01mm waited 2 minutes then restarted whole program from beginning. On Thu, 12 Oct 2023, 21:59 andy pugh, wrote: > On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 02:41, andrew beck > wrote: > > > We stopped it and then changed a wear offset and it ignored the > toolchange

Re: [Emc-users] Lathe ignores tool number change using fanucy wear offset patch

2023-10-12 Thread andy pugh
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 02:41, andrew beck wrote: > We stopped it and then changed a wear offset and it ignored the toolchange > and tried to machine with t3 instead of changing to t4. Was this with run-from-line? (You say that you stopped it) Which line did you run from? -- atp "A motorcycle

[Emc-users] Lathe ignores tool number change using fanucy wear offset patch

2023-10-11 Thread andrew beck
Hey guys. Got a problem with my CNC lathe It randomally tried to run a program with the wrong tool number. I'm using the fanucy wear offset patch to get wear offsets as linuxcnc doesn't offer that yet as stock standard. This lathe has done about 4000 toolchanges faultlessly. We stopped it and