> On 20 October 2016 at 16:44, Nicklas Karlsson
> wrote:
> >
> > You said no but write as yes. To put the motion planner on separate
> > computer is what I am looking at. The there would be no real time demand on
> > ordinary computer. I suspect these cheap
On 20 October 2016 at 16:44, Nicklas Karlsson
wrote:
>
> You said no but write as yes. To put the motion planner on separate computer
> is what I am looking at. The there would be no real time demand on ordinary
> computer. I suspect these cheap development boards
> >> I think I lost interest when I found something I didn't like about the
> >> interface between the PC and the Arduino from a real-time
> >> point-of-view.
> >
> > Pretty much every discussion of a split system has recognised that the
> > whole intent is to contain real-time processes entirely