SWPadnnos is correct. The only work around is to use a numbered o-word.
Adding string variables would be considerable effort for relatively
little payback.
Ken
Stephen Wille Padnos wrote:
Alan Condit wrote:
I think that I may have found a bug in the interpreter (at the very
least a
Additional clarification (example of calling indirect).
I think that I may have found a bug in the interpreter (at the very
least a problem).
Where oCallSubSub has the following lines in it:
oCallSubSub sub
(...)
o[#1] CALL [#2] [#3] [#4] [#5] [#6] [#7] ( Call routine
referenced by
Alan Condit wrote:
I think that I may have found a bug in the interpreter (at the very
least a problem).
This call works to call (indirect) o600 from within oCallSubSub
oCallSubSub call [600] [-0.1161] [-0.0062]
However, if you change to named o-words, then this call reports a bad
number
