Re: [Emc-users] Software question

2009-01-10 Thread Mark Wendt (Contractor)
At 03:27 PM 1/9/2009, you wrote: On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 08:06:18PM +, paul_c wrote: So what do *you* consider to be the alternatives capable of providing similar functionality ? This thread is more appropriate for emc-developers. This list is crazy enough lately! Please put any

Re: [Emc-users] Software question

2009-01-09 Thread Chris Radek
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 08:06:18PM +, paul_c wrote: So what do *you* consider to be the alternatives capable of providing similar functionality ? This thread is more appropriate for emc-developers. This list is crazy enough lately! Please put any responses there.

Re: [Emc-users] Software question

2009-01-08 Thread paul_c
On Wednesday 07 January 2009, Kenneth Lerman wrote: NML is used because it supports an environment where functions are split across multiple machines. I don't know how widely that functionality is used, though. As far as I'm concerned, it adds an unnecessary level of complexity. Please

Re: [Emc-users] Software question

2009-01-08 Thread Kenneth Lerman
For my use and for (as far as I can tell), almost everyone else, it is unnecessary. It is also complex. Ken paul_c wrote: On Wednesday 07 January 2009, Kenneth Lerman wrote: NML is used because it supports an environment where functions are split across multiple machines. I don't know how

Re: [Emc-users] Software question

2009-01-08 Thread paul_c
On Thursday 08 January 2009, Kenneth Lerman wrote: For my use and for (as far as I can tell), almost everyone else, it is unnecessary. NML describes the data structures as well as the methods for transmitting the PODs to the various parts of EMC - *Everyone* uses it. Even within the task

Re: [Emc-users] Software question

2009-01-08 Thread Alex Joni
Hi Richard, sorry it took a while to reply... Could someone explain or point me to documentation that explains the following: 1.What does the motion controller do? Is is part of HAL? How is it built? I see that the file motion.c has a 'main' function but the Makefile does not link it, only

[Emc-users] Software question

2009-01-07 Thread Richard F. Amaral
Could someone explain or point me to documentation that explains the following: 1.What does the motion controller do? Is is part of HAL? How is it built? I see that the file motion.c has a 'main' function but the Makefile does not link it, only compiles it to an object file. How is this

Re: [Emc-users] Software question

2009-01-07 Thread Kenneth Lerman
I'll take a shot at answering number 3. Richard F. Amaral wrote: Could someone explain or point me to documentation that explains the following: ... 3. Why use NML? Why not use just shared memory? Is NML an attempt at standardizing communication between software entities, i.e.