Re: [Emc-users] Well, that's a pain.

Ben Jackson wrote: >> > Looking atwww.senderbase.org (Cisco's IronPort Security portal), I find >> > their reputation rating forwww.linuxcnc.org is "poor". Why? It doesn't >> > say, specifically. > I'm surprised this list was unaware that linuxcnc.org had been hijacked. > When I was first sett

Re: [Emc-users] Well, that's a pain.

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 02:42:30PM -0400, Kent A. Reed wrote: > > Looking at www.senderbase.org (Cisco's IronPort Security portal), I find > their reputation rating for www.linuxcnc.org is "poor". Why? It doesn't > say, specifically. I'm surprised this list was unaware that linuxcnc.org had bee

Re: [Emc-users] Well, that's a pain.

On 10/12/2011 5:10 AM, andy pugh wrote: > No more checking the forums / docs pages from work for me any more: > > "Based on your corporate access policies, this web site ( > http://www.linuxcnc.org/ ) has been blocked because it has been > determined to be a security threat to your computer or the

Re: [Emc-users] Well, that's a pain.

Most companies that have web blockers have a fairly strict policy against using proxies. I wouldn't want to try to find out if it's on the list or not. Eric On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Dave wrote: > On 10/12/2011 5:21 PM, andy pugh wrote: > > On 12 October 2011 22:13, John Robinson > wrot

Re: [Emc-users] Well, that's a pain.

On 10/12/2011 5:21 PM, andy pugh wrote: > On 12 October 2011 22:13, John Robinson > wrote: > >> See how they like this... >> >> https://www.torproject.org/projects/torbrowser.html.en >> > I suspect that if they found that on my company laptop I would be > going home early. > > Ther

Re: [Emc-users] Well, that's a pain.

On 12 October 2011 22:13, John Robinson wrote: > See how they like this... > > https://www.torproject.org/projects/torbrowser.html.en I suspect that if they found that on my company laptop I would be going home early. -- atp "Torque wrenches are for the obedience of fools and the guidance of wi

Re: [Emc-users] Well, that's a pain.

See how they like this... https://www.torproject.org/projects/torbrowser.html.en On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Bryce Johnson wrote: > If you look at this > > http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:qG2QvQpF3zoJ:www.linuxcnc.org/+linuxcnc&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us > > This is Goog

Re: [Emc-users] Well, that's a pain.

If you look at this http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:qG2QvQpF3zoJ:www.linuxcnc.org/+linuxcnc&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us This is Google's cache of http://www.linuxcnc.org/. It is a snapshot of the page as it appeared on Oct 8, 2011 08:36:07 GMT. The current page

Re: [Emc-users] Well, that's a pain.

On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 8:18 PM, Steve Blackmore wrote: > On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 09:35:18 -0500, you wrote: > >>Maybe be related to whatever malware or bug seemed to get on the server >>changing some of the page titles.  My corp filter doesn't seem to be >>blocking it yet (websense). >> >>http://www.

Re: [Emc-users] Well, that's a pain.

On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 09:35:18 -0500, you wrote: >Maybe be related to whatever malware or bug seemed to get on the server >changing some of the page titles. My corp filter doesn't seem to be >blocking it yet (websense). > >http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Alinuxcnc.org&hl=en&biw=1280&bih=939&nu

Re: [Emc-users] Well, that's a pain.

Maybe be related to whatever malware or bug seemed to get on the server changing some of the page titles. My corp filter doesn't seem to be blocking it yet (websense). http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Alinuxcnc.org&hl=en&biw=1280&bih=939&num=10&lr=&ft=i&cr=&safe=images&tbs= 1. git.linuxc

Re: [Emc-users] Well, that's a pain.

Andy, I have a mirror of the docs on my web site. John On 10/12/2011 4:10 AM, andy pugh wrote: > No more checking the forums / docs pages from work for me any more: > > "Based on your corporate access policies, this web site ( > http://www.linuxcnc.org/ ) has been blocked because it has been > d

Re: [Emc-users] Well, that's a pain.

On 12.10.11 10:47, andy pugh wrote: > I have no idea who the network admin is, and EMC2 is most decidedly > not a part of my daily work, so it is actually difficult to think of a > reason to approach them without admitting that I use the web for non > work-related things. The theoretical considera

Re: [Emc-users] Well, that's a pain.

On 12.10.11 05:28, gene heskett wrote: > Since emc is part and parcel to your daily work, I think I'd take the > above, and a suitably sized attitude adjuster when I went to talk to your > network admin. Tempting as it is to march in with a very large spiral flute tap in fist, it can sometimes b

Re: [Emc-users] Well, that's a pain.

On 12 October 2011 10:28, gene heskett wrote: > Since emc is part and parcel to your daily work, I think I'd take the > above, and a suitably sized attitude adjuster when I went to talk to your > network admin. I have no idea who the network admin is, and EMC2 is most decidedly not a part of my

Re: [Emc-users] Well, that's a pain.

For what its worth, this is googles idea of your problem http://www.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=www.linuxcnc.org maybe you need an old lady detector in your company?? j. Safe Browsing*Diagnostic page for* www.linuxcnc.org *What is the current listing status for www.linuxcnc.org?*

Re: [Emc-users] Well, that's a pain.

On Wednesday, October 12, 2011 05:23:01 AM andy pugh did opine: > No more checking the forums / docs pages from work for me any more: > > "Based on your corporate access policies, this web site ( > http://www.linuxcnc.org/ ) has been blocked because it has been > determined to be a security threa

[Emc-users] Well, that's a pain.

No more checking the forums / docs pages from work for me any more: "Based on your corporate access policies, this web site ( http://www.linuxcnc.org/ ) has been blocked because it has been determined to be a security threat to your computer or the corporate network. This web site has been associa