Yes I have been playing with the FEM work bench in freecad. There is
also a full blown FEA program from the french power company EDF it is
open source and used to build all the french nuclear reactors and hydro
electric projects so it is very robust and well audited. It is written
in fortran
yes this is a big issue rigidity and vibration damning have
traditionally been done by increasing the mass and by using cast iron
that has a natural tendency to absorb and dissipate vibration.
You can build very rigid light wait structures but most of these have
harmonics like a tuning fork.
the industry sales pitch for the stewart platforms and delta machines is
that they are
dynamically stiff. that the servos force the frame into a rigid state.
I'm not one
to believe anything a salesman ( pirata ) says, but the early work at NIST
says thats what happens
i'm talking commercial
On 8 November 2015 at 02:10, Kyle Kerr wrote:
> Re: homing. Delta printers usually home at the top of their travel. When I
> asked my CNC instructor about a delta mill he said the lack of rigidity
> would kill accuracy.
It can be done, in fact one of the very first applications
This is cool with the six legs of a start platform the forces should be
balanced as you have one leg in tension and the corresponding one in
compression. I could see motor tuning could be fun with multiple pid
loops all fighting each other. We will see if I get that far at least I
know some
On 11/8/2015 4:13 AM, linden wrote:
> yes this is a big issue rigidity and vibration damning have
> traditionally been done by increasing the mass and by using cast iron
> that has a natural tendency to absorb and dissipate vibration.
>
> You can build very rigid light wait structures but most of
Have a look at ABB robots flex picker.
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=abb+robot+picker
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
--
On 11/6/2015 5:29 PM, TJoseph Powderly wrote:
> well it is like the rostock but has extra constraint in the extra 3
> tracks and arms
> maybe this is to increase the rigidity.
>
> the standard rostock looks and feels really wiggly to anyone used to
> tool room machines.
>
> the drawings _suggest_
Hi Linden!
On 07.11.2015 00:55, linden wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I have progressed a little with the design and modeling of the machine I
> asked for help simulating. It has evolved a little over the last few
> weeks. have a look at the pdf attached for pictures Another month and I
> will be back
Thanks for taking the time to look at the pictures and read through my
chicken scratch notes. Now I know that Linuxcnc should be able to
control something like this and we have a potential solution for
homing. I will keep going. I really need a real Internet connection or
some card board to
Re: homing. Delta printers usually home at the top of their travel. When I
asked my CNC instructor about a delta mill he said the lack of rigidity
would kill accuracy.
On Sat, Nov 7, 2015, 7:38 PM linden wrote:
> Thanks for taking the time to look at the pictures and read
On 6 November 2015 at 23:55, linden wrote:
> Could linuxCNC something control this? or do I have 2 many variables with no
> fixed base position?
It is do-able, I think. You might have redundant constraint, if so
the kinematics will need to be rather accurate.
It is a bit like
Hello All,
I have progressed a little with the design and modeling of the machine I
asked for help simulating. It has evolved a little over the last few
weeks. have a look at the pdf attached for pictures Another month and I
will be back to the world of fast Internet and I should be able to
http://seemecnc.com/products/rostock-max-complete-kit
There are lots out there like that for 3D printing.
> -Original Message-
> From: linden [mailto:l...@island.net]
> Sent: November-06-15 3:55 PM
> To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Emc-users] could Linux cnc control of
well it is like the rostock but has extra constraint in the extra 3
tracks and arms
maybe this is to increase the rigidity.
the standard rostock looks and feels really wiggly to anyone used to
tool room machines.
the drawings _suggest_ use of iron C channel, so I _guess_ rigidity is
sought
this describes the stiffness and joint aspects better
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SSSvKt92tnA
no ball joints!
a knuckle/nutating head on end of 'inverted rostock'
--
___
16 matches
Mail list logo