I think the easiest way to do this is for a point to point network or
even a network with a hub is to use raw ethernet packets. An ethernet
packet has a payload of up to 1500 bytes. That should be large enough
for most things we would want.
On top of the payload we have around 20 bytes of
We've had previous discussions about using ethernet for real time control.
In theory, this is NOT difficult stuff. I'll bet I could get something
going in a week or three.
In practice, though, it is a PITA. That's because you would need a real
time driver for each of the zillion or so different
At 09:55 AM 11/28/2008, you wrote:
Gentlemen,
My comments are not focused on real time. An analogy may be helpful.
In our shop we have 3 axis mills, 4 axis mills and 5 axis mills. I
tell the shop to put everything on the 5 axis mills until they are
full and then let the overflow (3 axis
Mark Wendt (Contractor) wrote:
At 09:55 AM 11/28/2008, you wrote:
Gentlemen,
... snipped ...
The application of EMC2 to many and various projects (not just real
time) would lead to a clearing of the 'real time geek fog' surrounding
this type of project. We need to take the IFM button
Gentlemen,
My comments are not focused on real time. An analogy may be helpful.
In our shop we have 3 axis mills, 4 axis mills and 5 axis mills. I
tell the shop to put everything on the 5 axis mills until they are
full and then let the overflow (3 axis work) move to the 3 axis mills.
I want
] general control thoughts
Kenneth Lerman wrote:
We've had previous discussions about using ethernet for real time control.
In theory, this is NOT difficult stuff. I'll bet I could get something
going in a week or three.
In practice, though, it is a PITA. That's because you would need a real
time
I think the easiest way to do this is for a point to point network or
even a network with a hub is to use raw ethernet packets. An ethernet
packet has a payload of up to 1500 bytes. That should be large enough
for most things we would want.
On top of the payload we have around 20 bytes of
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 08:55:02 -0600
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] general control thoughts
Gentlemen,
My comments are not focused on real time. An analogy may be helpful.
In our shop we have 3 axis mills, 4 axis mills and 5
On Nov 28, 2008, at 5:07 AM, Steve Stallings wrote:
100 uS frame interval is interesting, but this stuff is far from
open source/free software model.
I'll have to do some reading about it. But as far as I understood from
the guy explaining it to me, the 100 Mbit driver is open, the 1Gbit
Kenneth Lerman wrote:
I think the easiest way to do this is for a point to point network or
even a network with a hub is to use raw ethernet packets. An ethernet
packet has a payload of up to 1500 bytes. That should be large enough
for most things we would want.
On top of the payload we
That would be cool to control non real time stuff over the ethernet or
something.
John
On 26 Nov 2008 at 23:36, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
Gentlemen,
I think the idea of controlling everyday things with EMC2 is
the
right thing to do. The more things controlled the better the
On Nov 27, 2008, at 3:08 PM, John Thornton wrote:
That would be cool to control non real time stuff over the ethernet
or something.
Why not control realtime stuff over ethernet? I stumbled upon this a
while ago:
http://www.ethernet-powerlink.org/index.php?id=17
Gentlemen,
I think the
But how do you program something different then a milling machine,
lathe, or whatever? Control your home with G-codes? Do you have any
specific things in mind?
hal and pyvcp give you gui and control without g codes
spa, washer, dryer, heating and air, dishwasher, refrig, security,
door bell,
100 uS frame interval is interesting, but this stuff is far from
open source/free software model.
-Original Message-
From: Dirk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2008 2:55 PM
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] general control
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 10:07 PM, Steve Stallings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
100 uS frame interval is interesting, but this stuff is far from
open source/free software model.
why is this not 'open source/free'?
-
This SF.Net
]=9tx_abdownloads_pi1[cate
gory_uid]=8tx_abdownloads_pi1[cid]=21cHash=838e8cbbf7
Steve Stallings
-Original Message-
From: Stuart Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2008 11:16 PM
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] general control thoughts
]
Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2008 11:16 PM
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] general control thoughts
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 10:07 PM, Steve Stallings
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
100 uS frame interval is interesting, but this stuff is far
from
, November 27, 2008 11:16 PM
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] general control thoughts
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 10:07 PM, Steve Stallings
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
100 uS frame interval is interesting, but this stuff is far
from open
source/free software model.
why
Gentlemen,
I think the idea of controlling everyday things with EMC2 is the
right thing to do. The more things controlled the better the
understanding. EMC2 is so versatile it can control and 'enhance'
almost any project. The more people using it the less geeky (if that
is a word) it is. I
19 matches
Mail list logo
