Re: [Emc-users] tripodkins & all the others actually

2017-07-30 Thread andy pugh
On 30 July 2017 at 19:50, Charles Brauer wrote: > Well I think you're right "bkt" somehow to simplify the xyz trikins install > process all the other types of real time machines have been removed from > the the compile process. I don't understand what you are saying

Re: [Emc-users] tripodkins & others

2017-07-30 Thread Sebastian Kuzminsky
On 07/30/2017 01:05 PM, Charles Brauer wrote: Yes, there it is in the config files... there is none for any others. So what happened to them. No Hexypod. nada. I could go back, but HAL has changed and they probably wouldn't run. We reorganized the layout of the configs with the intent of

Re: [Emc-users] tripodkins & others

2017-07-30 Thread Charles Brauer
Yes, there it is in the config files... there is none for any others. So what happened to them. No Hexypod. nada. I could go back, but HAL has changed and they probably wouldn't run. -- Check out the vibrant tech

Re: [Emc-users] tripodkins & all the others actually

2017-07-30 Thread Charles Brauer
Well I think you're right "bkt" somehow to simplify the xyz trikins install process all the other types of real time machines have been removed from the the compile process. I thought if I just rebuilt linux cnc from scratch I'd get them, but no... following the directions in "Building LinuxCNC",

Re: [Emc-users] tripodkins

2017-07-28 Thread Nicklas SB Karlsson
Problem with the kinematics and it will move but not as expected? On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 16:03:56 +0200 theman whosoldtheworld wrote: > normally the first trouble is about your geometry and kins there are > some different version of kins on web. > The kinematic present

Re: [Emc-users] tripodkins

2017-07-28 Thread theman whosoldtheworld
normally the first trouble is about your geometry and kins there are some different version of kins on web. The kinematic present in linuxcnc serves to simplify your life, but it is not said to be the same as another one you might have taken into consideration. Fortunately, in the world,

Re: [Emc-users] tripodkins

2017-07-27 Thread Nicklas Karlsson
> I can't get the hal file right to run a stepper tripod. If someone could > share one that runs on wheezy I would be most appreciative. I was thinking > I could build a 3d printer with this. You get something up and running. What works? And what does not work? >

Re: [Emc-users] Tripodkins

2017-07-27 Thread Charles Brauer
And the last question is if I compile this code on my fast computer, running under VMware Workstation, will I be able to transfer an iso file to another computer and install it or just use the resultant hal file? -- Check

Re: [Emc-users] Tripodkins

2017-07-27 Thread Charles Brauer
I guess what I could do is get on "github" and get the files and compile it using: ./configure --enable-run-in-place. (I didn't want to do all this work...) This would hopefully give me the hal files I want. (me wanting the softer way). This caused me to take a look at Machineket, which I don't

Re: [Emc-users] tripodkins

2017-07-26 Thread Sebastian Kuzminsky
On 07/26/2017 05:36 PM, Charles Brauer wrote: I can't get the hal file right to run a stepper tripod. If someone could share one that runs on wheezy I would be most appreciative. I was thinking I could build a 3d printer with this. I ran sim/tklinuxcnc/tripod.ini on 2.7 and master, and both

Re: [Emc-users] tripodkins

2017-07-26 Thread andy pugh
On 27 July 2017 at 00:36, Charles Brauer wrote: > I can't get the hal file right to run a stepper tripod. If someone could > share one that runs on wheezy I would be most appreciative. I was thinking > I could build a 3d printer with this. That sounds like a fun

Re: [Emc-users] tripodkins

2017-07-26 Thread Charles Brauer
I can't get the hal file right to run a stepper tripod. If someone could share one that runs on wheezy I would be most appreciative. I was thinking I could build a 3d printer with this. -- Check out the vibrant tech