On Thursday 02 April 2020 10:03:03 Ken Strauss wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Gene Heskett [mailto:ghesk...@shentel.net]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2020 8:51 AM
> > To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] wild hare con
On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 at 15:05, Ken Strauss wrote:
> My point was that allowing expansion of the number at HAL load time and
> allocating a numbered variable for each possible input is problematic. You
> might as well always allocate 16 and dispense with the parameter that
> changes the maximum
> -Original Message-
> From: Gene Heskett [mailto:ghesk...@shentel.net]
> Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2020 8:51 AM
> To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] wild hare continued.
>
> On Thursday 02 April 2020 07:23:28 Ken Strauss wrote:
>
>
On Thursday 02 April 2020 08:36:11 andy pugh wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 at 12:25, Ken Strauss wrote:
> > > The fact that m66 Enn uses #5399 regardless of the nn is being an
> > > obstacle. It means that I'll have to use some digital outputs to
> > > tally whether or not #5399 has been read and
On Thursday 02 April 2020 07:23:28 Ken Strauss wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Gene Heskett [mailto:ghesk...@shentel.net]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2020 6:42 AM
> > To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
> > Subject: [Emc-users] wild hare continued.
> >
> > Greetings Andy;
> >
On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 at 12:25, Ken Strauss wrote:
> > The fact that m66 Enn uses #5399 regardless of the nn is being an
> > obstacle. It means that I'll have to use some digital outputs to tally
> > whether or not #5399 has been read and by whom.
I don't understand the problem. The inputs can
> -Original Message-
> From: Gene Heskett [mailto:ghesk...@shentel.net]
> Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2020 6:42 AM
> To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
> Subject: [Emc-users] wild hare continued.
>
> Greetings Andy;
>
> I have some of the data transfers working, but I then recall you said
