Thank you Michael, I like your comments very much for the connections they
make to what has been brewing in philosophy and elsewhere about aesthetics
And then how these are being debated among so called media theorists. So New
Aesthetics is not only new; it is not newly discussed. And
thank you Tim and Renata and SimonI have enjoyed both months on empyre
Patricia
From: empyre-boun...@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
[empyre-boun...@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au] On Behalf Of Timothy Conway Murray
[t...@cornell.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, August 01,
Again wonderful discussions of screen. I was wondering where to find
Laplanche's treatment of traumatophilia?Also affect on a grid might be
thought of as affect-itself or something abstracted like labor power. The
question is by what mathematics or technology of computation is
Yes in this definition of the screen which I very much like we move away from
screen being about representation of the visual. I also think this brings me
back to debates around the object. I think of Whitehead's notion of the
subject as that specific point or angle to realize an
Thanks for these sites They are greatPatricia
From: empyre-boun...@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
[empyre-boun...@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au] On Behalf Of xDxD.vs.xDxD
[xdxd.vs.x...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 2:56 PM
To: soft_skinned_space
I agree with Martin. I am really enjoying the conversation this week.
Patricia
From: empyre-boun...@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
[empyre-boun...@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au] On Behalf Of Martin Rieser
[martin.rie...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2012 4:50
to perceive the nano as a separate measurable
scale. I am interested in the way in which plastic, as a medium, connects to a
politics of imperceptibility.
heather.
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Clough, Patricia
pclo...@gc.cuny.edumailto:pclo...@gc.cuny.edu wrote:
Thanks to all who engaged during
Thanks for this Rob. It makes a lot of senseWhat is coming with art
after philosophy but again will be interesting. What do you think of the
queer stuff we have been viewing and discussing int his regard? Patricia
From:
Dear All I agree with Ian that reading is helpful and interesting Just
finishing Democracy of Objects by Levi Bryant I can say there is quite a
bit of exposition there. Difference between him and Graham (and much that is
similar) Differences between him and Deleuze (also some
at a nanoscale, and are able to perceive the nano as a separate measurable
scale. I am interested in the way in which plastic, as a medium, connects to a
politics of imperceptibility.
heather.
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Clough, Patricia
pclo...@gc.cuny.edumailto:pclo...@gc.cuny.edu wrote
Thanks to all who engaged during week 3 and welcome week 4Patricia
From: empyre-boun...@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
[empyre-boun...@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au] On Behalf Of Elle Mehrmand
[ellemehrm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2012 8:43 PM
To:
untranslatable.
Yours, Tim
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Clough, Patricia
pclo...@gc.cuny.edumailto:pclo...@gc.cuny.edu wrote:
Yes I do think that this is a great question: are we in anyone else's
moment? Never mind one's own While I do appreciate your point about
Oh this (2) below is one that grabs me. I often ask students especially when
I get tired of asking myself how close to the crisis do we need to get to
figure a way around, through away from---change it. How do we theorize or
approach that which is blinding us called the present
, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Clough, Patricia pclo...@gc.cuny.edu wrote:
Oh this (2) below is one that grabs me. I often ask students especially
when I get tired of asking myself how close to the crisis do we need to get
to figure a way around, through away from---change it. How do we theorize
Berlant
George M. Pullman
Professor
Department of English
University of Chicago
Walker Museum 413
1115 E. 58th. St.
Chicago IL 60637
-Original Message-
From: Clough, Patricia pclo...@gc.cuny.edu/mc/compose?to=pclo...@gc.cuny.edu
Hi allI want first to say I have seen Jennifer Montgomery's video Its
very affective. Thanks Lauren and Jack for the commentI want to move on
to Zach's good questionsbut before I do I also had a thought about affect
and digital and object oriented/SR. I do think that what
Message-
From: Clough, Patricia pclo...@gc.cuny.edu
To: soft_skinned_space empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
Sent: Sun, Jun 17, 2012 1:15 pm
Subject: Re: [-empyre-] the real and reality in speculative realism and OOO/P
I have just finished
reading a piece by Latour on big data for
a paper I
can put a patent. Maybe - as Muriel
Combes says in La vie inséparée - a living being cannot be separated
from its form. Maybe we need absolutely another ontology to fight this
one.
Best,
Frederic Neyrat
2012/6/17 Clough, Patricia pclo...@gc.cuny.edu:
I am not sure this got throughsince I am
Hi Frederic aka grumbling smurf
There is outside in object orientedthe question is the nature of
relations. For Harman nothing is connectedand the outside is in the
difference between the object and its sensual qualities (also its real
qualities ) for Deleuzians however the
Well starting off in the last week is difficult. So much going on over the
last three weeks. Thanks to Zach and Micha for the invite and to everyone
else offering some great thoughts to ponder.
As for discussion around feminism, queer and OOO/ SR There are (still/even
more) worrisome
I am not sure this got throughsince I am also missing some of Tim's I
think but I will put it here below but first. Just to say that objects in
OOO are not objectifications or mere things or commodities. A turn to
ontology (whether OOO or feminist queer ones) is to give us a sense
21 matches
Mail list logo
