Hi Patricia,
1/ You wrote: They are lively before or without human consciousness.
I think this arouses more respect for the environment and the cosmos
not to mention human beings and other living things:
I'm not sure about that. I would like, but I'm note sure. I'm just
thinking about the hunter
Wow Patricia this is amazing. I'm still reading through it. I'm such a huge fan
of Bollas by the way.
One could, in OOO terms, imagine Bollas's objects as part of a region of what
Harman an I call sensual objects, which inhabit the interzone between things.
Or as Marcia, my new (and sadly
I have just finished reading a piece by Latour on big data for a paper I am
writing with three students (Josh Scannell, Benjamin Haber and Karen Gregory
who are lurking on the site). One of Latour's points is that the two level
analysis carried on in sociology (but everywhere else as well)
Hi Frederic aka grumbling smurf
There is outside in object orientedthe question is the nature of
relations. For Harman nothing is connectedand the outside is in the
difference between the object and its sensual qualities (also its real
qualities ) for Deleuzians however the
