--empyre- soft-skinned space--Thanks, Quinn,
I'd like to pick up this question of digital objects as memory aid or
receptacle, specifically the role of or status of computer source code.
For the past eight years, I have been working in the realm of Critical Code
--empyre- soft-skinned space--Dear all,
I would like to address a special thanks to Alexander, Quinn, Dani, Ben,
and John for discussing together the notion of process. It was very
valuable and I hope to continue to exchange further with you on that topic.
I would
--empyre- soft-skinned space-- I’m sorry John and Anais about not responding to your comments. I receive
the “digest” version of the list, and was referring to the online archive
for responses. But it seems your messages got truncated there, so I had not
read them:
--empyre- soft-skinned space--Hi all,
I would like to respond to Alexander’s fruitful post as well as to share
some considerations raised by Quinn’s invitation to dig more into the
so-called algorithmic information theory.
My first thought concerns the feedback
--empyre- soft-skinned space--Thanks Ben and Quinn for your responses.
I would like to address certain points raised.
Ben is interested in the link I was alluding to between discretization and
the digital. It seems to me the movement from the prediscrete
--empyre- soft-skinned space--(here is the missing part of my earlier contribution. thank you)
One suggestion I would like to discuss is that the feedback loop seems to
deal with processes of selection not only based on complexity and
randomness (a shared
--empyre- soft-skinned space--
Thanks to Anaïs, Ashley and Quinn for inviting me to take part in this
discussion.
Just to pick up a point in Alexander's very productive post.
I am interested in the connection Alexander is forging between
discretization (in
--empyre- soft-skinned space--
Such a rich and complex post, with many points of resonance to earlier posts!
I think Alexander’s reference to Chaitin’s “Omega” number really needs some
underlining, since I suspect most of us aren’t too familiar with the concept. I
--empyre- soft-skinned space--
On 22/Oct/14 17:13, Quinn DuPont wrote:
--empyre- soft-skinned space-- Such a rich and
complex post, with many points of resonance to earlier posts!
I think Alexander’s reference to Chaitin’s “Omega” number
--empyre- soft-skinned space--Hello to everyone on the list. Thanks to our hosts for organizing this
discussion (and for inviting me). I've just caught up on the discussion
sthus far.
I thought I'd give a go at the first question proposed:
What is a digital process?
--empyre- soft-skinned space--
FYI on the topic of digital art algorithms, etc, there's a great talk by my
friend Dr. Frieder Nake, a radical German pioneer in the field, talking about
early algorithmic work in the 1960s -- he's an engaging and empathetic speaker
--empyre- soft-skinned space--Dear group,
Thank you all for your incredibly rich contributions, you made this past
two weeks so fascinating as we try to unpack collectively the potential of
digital objects.
I would like to circulate the introduction for our third
--empyre- soft-skinned space--Now, with this being said - As Chun (2008) has discussed, and as Kristie and Dragan commented in their closing remarks (I think), despite the cascading complexity of the digital, and the dispersed apparatus that props it up, digital
--empyre- soft-skinned space--Dear Ashley, all
good question indeed - I'm wondering whether looking at Thrift and
Dewsbury's non-representational theory mightn't offer some useful
insights? This entails focus on practices and relations (across human and
non-human
--empyre- soft-skinned space--Dear --empyre-- members and invited discussants,
Thank you for an engaging start to this month's conversation!
I have a bit of a follow-up question that I feel engages several of the
entries thus far and that, I hope, might get us
--empyre- soft-skinned space--
Dear empyre,
thank you very much the invitation to participate in this discussion.
In my work as a conservator of digital art (mostly internet art), I am often
confronted with the term 'object'. On the Digital Preservation 2014
--empyre- soft-skinned space--*Welcome to October, 2014 on --empyre-- soft-skinned space: *
*DIGITAL OBJECTS *
Moderated by Quinn DuPont (CA), Anais Nony (FR), and Ashley Scarlett (CA)
with invited discussants to include: Ange Albertini (US); Dragan Epstein
(DE);
17 matches
Mail list logo
