sec...@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [Emu] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-emu-eaptlscert-06
Hi Stefan,
I made a minor update to reflect your feedback
(https://github.com/emu-wg/eaptls-longcert/compare/3ac0a18..2093026):
Thus, the AIA extension can reduce the size of the certificate chain by
Hi Stefan,
I made a minor update to reflect your feedback
(https://github.com/emu-wg/eaptls-longcert/compare/3ac0a18..2093026):
Thus, the AIA extension can reduce the size of the certificate chain by only
including a pointer to the issuer certificate instead of including the entire
issuer cert
Hi,
I think the text is great.
However I'm not entirely convinced that AIA requires network connectivity at
all times.
The AIA CA cert url is static and works fine as identifier for a locally cached
cert
The fact that it is the correct cert is assured by the path validation process.
As such, th
Hi Stefan,
Thank you for the review. I have updated the draft in github
(https://github.com/emu-wg/eaptls-longcert). Here is the diff for your
convenience:
https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-emu-eaptlscert.txt&url2=https://emu-wg.github.io/eaptls-longcert/d
Hi Stefan,
Thanks for the review; it raises some good topics.
Replying on a couple points...
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 04:13:02PM -0700, Stefan Santesson via Datatracker
wrote:
> Reviewer: Stefan Santesson
> Review result: Has Nits
>
> The document in general is good and well written.
>
> Some n
Reviewer: Stefan Santesson
Review result: Has Nits
The document in general is good and well written.
Some nits needs attention before publication as the general review also points
out. Ex in the abstract "This document looks at the this problem"
Some abbreviations needs to be spelled out at firs
