Re: [Emu] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on charter-ietf-emu-04-00: (with COMMENT)
Mirja, The milestones have been updated per the dates and language provided by Jari. Thanks, Kathleen On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 11:36 AM, Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) wrote: > Yes. I don’t see a big difference between „WGLC" and "send to IESG“ but it’s > good to have a deadline! > >> Am 18.02.2018 um 12:48 schrieb Jari Arkko : >> >> Mirja, >> >>> I would actually rather like to see milestones for when the work is >>> supposed to >>> be finished (send to IESG for publication) than when it is supposed to start >>> (wg adoption) as the first is probably harder to achieve in time than the >>> second. >> >> I suggested edits to the milestones in a response to Kathleen’s >> comments, and the suggested edits include having both start >> (adopt) and end (WGLC) for all work items. Does that work for >> you? >> >> (Although some of our charters speak about WGLC and others >> about sending to IESG… not sure the difference matters.) >> >> Jari >> > > ___ > Emu mailing list > Emu@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu -- Best regards, Kathleen ___ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
Re: [Emu] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on charter-ietf-emu-04-00: (with COMMENT)
Yes. I don’t see a big difference between „WGLC" and "send to IESG“ but it’s good to have a deadline! > Am 18.02.2018 um 12:48 schrieb Jari Arkko : > > Mirja, > >> I would actually rather like to see milestones for when the work is supposed >> to >> be finished (send to IESG for publication) than when it is supposed to start >> (wg adoption) as the first is probably harder to achieve in time than the >> second. > > I suggested edits to the milestones in a response to Kathleen’s > comments, and the suggested edits include having both start > (adopt) and end (WGLC) for all work items. Does that work for > you? > > (Although some of our charters speak about WGLC and others > about sending to IESG… not sure the difference matters.) > > Jari > ___ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
Re: [Emu] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on charter-ietf-emu-04-00: (with COMMENT)
Mirja, > I would actually rather like to see milestones for when the work is supposed > to > be finished (send to IESG for publication) than when it is supposed to start > (wg adoption) as the first is probably harder to achieve in time than the > second. I suggested edits to the milestones in a response to Kathleen’s comments, and the suggested edits include having both start (adopt) and end (WGLC) for all work items. Does that work for you? (Although some of our charters speak about WGLC and others about sending to IESG… not sure the difference matters.) Jari ___ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
