- Original Message -
Hi, All
I know about Openstack can support many kind of storage, it's cinder
component can support storage like IBM, HP, DELL, and can get all support
list from :https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CinderSupportMatrix
and Openstack have many driver can use for
- Original Message -
Hi all,
I'm Nir from storage team. I work mostly on vdsm.
I want power-user permissions for jenkins.ovirt.org so I would be able to
create and modify jobs related to vdsm.
+1 from me.
Thanks,
Nir
___
- Original Message -
- Original Message -
From: Ayal Baron aba...@redhat.com
To: Alon Bar-Lev alo...@redhat.com
Cc: Itamar Heim ih...@redhat.com, engine-devel
engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-de...@lists.fedorahosted.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 9:20:55 AM
- Original Message -
- Original Message -
From: Ayal Baron aba...@redhat.com
To: Alon Bar-Lev alo...@redhat.com
Cc: Itamar Heim ih...@redhat.com, engine-devel
engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-de...@lists.fedorahosted.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 10:09:46 AM
- Original Message -
- Original Message -
From: Itamar Heim ih...@redhat.com
To: Alon Bar-Lev alo...@redhat.com
Cc: David Caro dcaro...@redhat.com, engine-devel
engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-de...@lists.fedorahosted.org
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:54:39 PM
- Original Message -
hi,
maybe i do not make you understand me fully. i am reading vdsm code, but it
is hard for me to understand StorageDomain,StoragePool. before stoargeD(P)
can work, engine must prepare many things.
i want to know the call flow (process) which must be done to
- Original Message -
I have left this for a while without continuing because I had to focus
on other things. However this is still in progress :-)
Are you writing patches? (if so, what solution are you pursuing)
On 03/13/2013 10:55 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message
- Original Message -
On Sun 17 Mar 2013 10:12:55 PM CST, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
Hi guys,
Currently, ISO domain is only supported on NFS storage. It could
improve the ease of use if it allows other types
of file based storage to store ISO images
- Original Message -
On 03/18/2013 04:43 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
Mark Wu :
On Sun 17 Mar 2013 10:12:55 PM CST, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
Hi guys,
Currently, ISO domain is only supported on NFS storage. It could
- Original Message -
On 03/13/2013 11:55 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
...
The only reason we have this problem is because there is this
thing against making multiple calls.
Just split it up.
getVmRuntimeStats() - transient things like mem and cpu%
getVmInformation() - (semi)static
- Original Message -
Hi guys,
Currently, ISO domain is only supported on NFS storage. It could
improve the ease of use if it allows other types
of file based storage to store ISO images. After an investigation, I
found there's not any restriction on this idea.
So the whole work
- Original Message -
On 17/03/13 15:13, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
On 03/13/2013 11:55 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
...
The only reason we have this problem is because there is this
thing against making multiple calls.
Just split it up.
getVmRuntimeStats
- Original Message -
I am completely against this.
It make the return value differ according to input which
is a big no no when talking about type safe APIs.
The only reason we have this problem is because there is this
thing against making multiple calls.
Just split it up.
- Original Message -
- Original Message -
From: Itamar Heim ih...@redhat.com
To: Saggi Mizrahi smizr...@redhat.com
Cc: VDSM Project Development vdsm-de...@lists.fedorahosted.org,
engine-devel engine-devel@ovirt.org
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 6:18:13 AM
- Original Message -
- Original Message -
From: Deepak C Shetty deepa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
To: Saggi Mizrahi smizr...@redhat.com
Cc: Shu Ming shum...@linux.vnet.ibm.com, engine-devel
engine-devel@ovirt.org, VDSM Project Development
- Original Message -
- Original Message -
From: Ayal Baron aba...@redhat.com
To: Saggi Mizrahi smizr...@redhat.com
Cc: engine-devel engine-devel@ovirt.org, VDSM Project
Development vdsm-de...@lists.fedorahosted.org, Deepak
C Shetty deepa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
- Original Message -
This is an addendum to my previous email.
- Original Message -
From: Saggi Mizrahi smizr...@redhat.com
To: Adam Litke a...@us.ibm.com
Cc: Dan Kenigsberg dan...@redhat.com, Ayal Baron
aba...@redhat.com, Federico Simoncelli
fsimo...@redhat.com
+1
Well deserved.
- Original Message -
+1
- Original Message -
From: Itamar Heim ih...@redhat.com
To: engine-devel@ovirt.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 6:12:09 AM
Subject: [Engine-devel] Proposal to add Allon Mureinik as
maintainer to engine core
- Original Message -
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 05:53:20AM -0400, Doron Fediuck wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Livnat Peer lp...@redhat.com
To: Dan Kenigsberg dan...@redhat.com
Cc: engine-devel@ovirt.org, Genadi Chereshnya
gcher...@redhat.com,
- Original Message -
- Original Message -
From: Ayal Baron aba...@redhat.com
To: Michael Kublin mkub...@redhat.com
Cc: Liron Aravot lara...@redhat.com, engine-devel
engine-devel@ovirt.org, Eduardo Warszawski
ewars...@redhat.com, Allon Mureinik amure...@redhat.com
- Original Message -
- Original Message -
From: Michael Kublin mkub...@redhat.com
To: Allon Mureinik amure...@redhat.com
Cc: Eduardo Warszawski ewars...@redhat.com, Liron Aravot
lara...@redhat.com, Maor Lipchuk
mlipc...@redhat.com, engine-devel
- Original Message -
- Original Message -
From: Ayal Baron aba...@redhat.com
To: Allon Mureinik amure...@redhat.com, Michael Kublin
mkub...@redhat.com
Cc: Liron Aravot lara...@redhat.com, engine-devel
engine-devel@ovirt.org, Eduardo Warszawski
ewars...@redhat.com
- Original Message -
i see in BackendDiskResource.update(), what is the status if this
item?
Is there a bug tracking this?
I don't recall anyone is working on this.
@Override
public Disk update(Disk disk) {
//TODO: implmenet when Backend is ready.
- Original Message -
On 08/01/2012 12:21 AM, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
On 07/31/2012 11:30 PM, Hopper, Ricky wrote:
Hey all,
As I'm making progress with the domain rescan functionality, I've
realized that I'm unsure what to do with any disks
- Original Message -
On 07/31/2012 11:30 PM, Hopper, Ricky wrote:
Hey all,
As I'm making progress with the domain rescan functionality, I've
realized that I'm unsure what to do with any disks that are
detected on
the domain. Should I add them back into the database to be
: Sunday, July 22, 2012 9:50:47 AM
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] java 1.6 compatibility no more?
On 21/07/12 15:15, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 07/19/2012 03:34 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
On Jul 19, 2012, at 14:14 , Livnat Peer wrote:
On 19/07/12 14:41, Juan
- Original Message -
On Jul 19, 2012, at 14:14 , Livnat Peer wrote:
On 19/07/12 14:41, Juan Hernandez wrote:
On 07/19/2012 01:39 PM, Yair Zaslavsky wrote:
On 07/19/2012 02:31 PM, Vojtech Szocs wrote:
Don't we need that (the source part) to avoid Java 7 syntax in
GWT code?
Hi all,
Sorry for cross-posting, but in this case I think it's relevant.
The original idea was that every time we wish to discuss a new cross-component
feature we should do it over arch list. However, it would appear that de-facto
usually engine-devel and vdsm-devel are being used (cross
- Original Message -
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 04:53:04AM -0400, Ayal Baron wrote:
Hi all,
Sorry for cross-posting, but in this case I think it's relevant.
The original idea was that every time we wish to discuss a new
cross-component feature we should do it over arch list
- Original Message -
- Original Message -
From: Ayal Baron aba...@redhat.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 4, 2012 9:29:55 AM
- Original Message -
On 07/03/2012 06:44 PM, Miki Kenneth wrote:
- Original Message -
Hey,
https
- Original Message -
On 07/03/2012 06:44 PM, Miki Kenneth wrote:
- Original Message -
Hey,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828089
I would like add a search option for searching disks of a VM or
Template,
Please suggest a name for the search
- Original Message -
- Original Message -
From: Shu Ming shum...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
To: Ori Liel ol...@redhat.com
Cc: engine-devel engine-devel@ovirt.org
Sent: Sunday, July 1, 2012 10:50:47 AM
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] restapi: Storage-Domain creation - Used
- Original Message -
On 06/10/2012 06:52 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 06/10/2012 06:35 PM, Omer Frenkel wrote:
if so why it
appear in /disks?,
i think root collection /disks should contain only items
available
for common usage.
(can't see any point in showing
Original Message
Subject: [Engine-devel] Advanced Nfs Options + NFSv4 GUI mockup
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 06:34:32 -0400 (EDT)
From: Einav Cohen eco...@redhat.com
To: Ayal Baron aba...@redhat.com, Eldan Hildesheim
ehild...@redhat.com,Eldan Hildesheim i...@eldanet.com
- Original Message -
- Original Message -
From: Ayal Baron aba...@redhat.com
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 10:46:44 PM
- Original Message -
From: Einav Cohen eco...@redhat.com
To: Andrew Cathrow acath...@redhat.com
Cc: engine-devel@ovirt.org
- Original Message -
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Cathrow acath...@redhat.com
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 5:15:51 PM
- Original Message -
From: Geert Jansen gjan...@redhat.com
To: Ayal Baron aba...@redhat.com
Cc: Andrew Cathrow acath...@redhat.com
- Original Message -
- Original Message -
From: Ayal Baron aba...@redhat.com
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 11:39:42 AM
- Original Message -
- Original Message -
From: Ayal Baron aba...@redhat.com
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 10:46:44 PM
...@redhat.com, Yair
Zaslavsky yzasl...@redhat.com, Ayal Baron
aba...@redhat.com, Miki Kenneth mkenn...@redhat.com
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 2:05:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] PosixFS: GUI mock-ups have been updated
...
The important thing is that it's clear what it is - eg
- Original Message -
This seems interesting.
I am interested in pursuing this further and helping contribute to
the
vdsm lsm integration. lsm is still in the early stages, but i feel
its
the right time to start influencing it so that vdsm integration
can
be
smooth.
- Original Message -
i can't see any justification for the 'gluster' prefix,
as this is only additional /service/ provided by the project,
and Gluster now is a part of the RHT.
I believe there needs to be an indication which service this is about.
If we will support provisioning
- Original Message -
On 05/06/2012 10:03 AM, Ori Liel wrote:
Still need to decide about this:
1) what's the name you'd give this parameter? job-id? batch-id?
flow-id? command-id? correlation-id???
job-id will confuse us with engine's job-id which is a single
command
- Original Message -
On 04/24/2012 07:37 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
On 04/24/2012 02:07 AM, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
On 04/22/2012 12:28 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
This way we'd have a 2 stage process:
1. setupStorage (generic)
I
-Original Message-
From: Ayal Baron [mailto:aba...@redhat.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2012 6:25 AM
To: Livnat Peer
Cc: engine-devel@ovirt.org; Schoenbrun, Dustin
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Disk Cloning When Creating a VM via a
Template
- Original Message -
On 26
- Original Message -
On 04/24/2012 02:07 AM, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
On 04/22/2012 12:28 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
This way we'd have a 2 stage process:
1. setupStorage (generic)
I was looking up on the VDSM archives and there are talks of
using
- Original Message -
On 04/22/2012 12:28 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
This way we'd have a 2 stage process:
1. setupStorage (generic)
I was looking up on the VDSM archives and there are talks of using
libstoragemgmt (lsm)
Funny, we started using that acronym for Live Storage
- Original Message -
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 09:06:36AM -0400, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 03:38:25PM +0530, Shireesh Anjal wrote:
Hi all,
As part of adding Gluster support in ovirt, we need to
introduce
some
- Original Message -
On 10/04/12 14:35, Geert Jansen wrote:
On 04/09/2012 05:14 PM, Ori Liel wrote:
The Floating Disks feature makes disks into stand-alone
entities: a
given disk may be attached to a VM (as all disks are today), or it
may
be not attached to any VM,
- Original Message -
On 02/14/2012 11:03 AM, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
On 02/14/2012 10:53 AM, Yair Zaslavsky wrote:
On 02/14/2012 10:35 AM, Yair Zaslavsky wrote:
On 02/14/2012 10:29 AM, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
On 02/14/2012 10:06 AM, Yair Zaslavsky wrote:
Hi all,
I modified the Wiki
Yair, what about import of VM more than once?
- Original Message -
Hi all,
I modified the Wiki pages of this feature:
http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/CloneVmFromSnapshot
http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/DetailedCloneVmFromSnapshot
Comments are more than welcome
Kind
- Original Message -
On 02/15/2012 09:44 AM, Igor Lvovsky wrote:
Hi,
I want to discuss $subject on the email just to be sure that we all
on the
same page.
So, today in 3.0 vdsm has two ways to create VM with cdrom :
1. If RHEV-M ask to create VM with cdrom, vdsm just
- Original Message -
On 02/14/2012 11:36 PM, Yair Zaslavsky wrote:
On 02/14/2012 10:03 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 02/14/2012 09:20 AM, Yair Zaslavsky wrote:
On 02/14/2012 08:59 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 02/14/2012 08:57 AM, Livnat Peer wrote:
On 14/02/12 05:56, Itamar Heim
- Original Message -
Hi Ayal,
- Original Message -
From: Ayal Baron aba...@redhat.com
To: Yaniv Kaul yk...@redhat.com
Cc: engine-devel@ovirt.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 12:19:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Autorecovery feature plan for review
also agree that this
feature would take a bigger effort. It would be nice to know what
effort it would take to get the monitoring do this safely. Could we
still call it monitoring then?
Laszlo
- Original Message -
From: Ayal Baron aba...@redhat.com
To: Laszlo Hornyak lhorn
- Original Message -
On 02/14/2012 07:44 PM, Livnat Peer wrote:
On 14/02/12 11:44, Maor wrote:
On 02/14/2012 09:17 AM, Livnat Peer wrote:
On 13/02/12 19:44, Maor wrote:
On 02/12/2012 07:03 PM, Livnat Peer wrote:
On 02/02/12 17:15, Maor wrote:
Hello all,
The shared raw
- Original Message -
On 02/05/2012 02:14 PM, Maor wrote:
...
3. The synchronization/clustering of shared raw disk between VMs
will
be managed in the file system.
either i don't understand what this mean, or it could be read with
a
misleading meaning.
Maybe the
- Original Message -
On 02/05/2012 02:57 PM, Miki Kenneth wrote:
...
Isn't the VM version derived from the version of the cluster on
which it was last edited?
For example: you've created a VM on a cluster v3.0. When it is
running on a v3.2 cluster, is there any reason to
- Original Message -
On 02/02/2012 08:46 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 02/02/2012 02:56 AM, Eli Mesika wrote:
Hi
We had discussed today the Stable Device Addresses feature
One of the questions arose from the meeting (and actually defined
as
an open issue in the feature wiki)
- Original Message -
Top Posting:
From user POV I think that option 2 is the only one that make sense.
We try to do as much as we can,
and on each problematic case, we make him aware and let him decide.
Yep, +1.
Miki
- Original Message -
From: Ayal Baron aba
- Original Message -
On 17/01/12 11:45, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
On 17/01/12 10:46, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 01/17/2012 10:32 AM, Omer Frenkel wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Itamar Heimih...@redhat.com
To: Jon Choatejcho...@redhat.com
59 matches
Mail list logo
