On Wed 2015-03-18 03:26:02 -0400, Patrick Brunschwig wrote:
> Yes, I think we can move away from enigmail-x-y to enigmail-x.y. I'll
> try to remember this when doing the next release.
great, thanks! If it would help any to have this decision recorded in
the repo, you could duplicate the 1-8 tag a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 17.03.15 20:09, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Hi Enigmail folks--
>
> Thanks for the enigmail v1.8 release, i hope to have it in debian
> experimental later today.
>
> I notice that the enigmail tagging scheme maps version 1.8 to
> enigmail-1-8
Hi Enigmail folks--
Thanks for the enigmail v1.8 release, i hope to have it in debian
experimental later today.
I notice that the enigmail tagging scheme maps version 1.8 to
enigmail-1-8. Presumably this is a holdover from the CVS days where a
tag couldn't have a . in it.
With git, tags can hav
