> It turned out there was a bug in the background thumbnail caching.
> Should be fixed in CVS.
>
> /Kim
Would it be possible to get an updated rpm on enlightenment.org?
Thanks,
Beny
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noti
On Sun, 2004-08-01 at 21:41, Didier Casse wrote:
> On 01/08/04, at 17:37 +0200, Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > I just installed e0.16.7 from rpm packages on FC1, before restarting
> > > it I renamed my .enlightenment directory and had 16.7 create a new
> > > one from scratch (jus
On Tuesday 03 August 2004 10:02 am, Peter Lundqvist wrote:
> Anyway - what I'm upset about is not who did what. It's the bad attitude.
> You don't have to badmouth anyone just because you disagree.
> A simple "Obviously she's wrong; here is why" is more than sufficient.
i wasnt bad mouthing her be
Hello all,
Ive been watching this list for a few years now, but I believe this is my
first post.
Ive been an enlightenment user since the days of DR13, and Ive always
wanted to contribute in some way to this project, and I thought now would
be a good time to do so.
Now, the question is: what can
Didier Casse wrote:
On 01/08/04, at 17:37 +0200, Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Beny Spensieri Jr wrote:
Hi everyone,
I just installed e0.16.7 from rpm packages on FC1, before restarting
it I renamed my .enlightenment directory and had 16.7 create a new
one from scratch (just to make sure
On Tue, 03 Aug 2004 00:42:43 PDT, Ogla Sungutay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Also, as an editor she should have been
> clear,specific, and precise when flaming the WM,I am
> guessing the E16. The term 'visual usuability' is
> rather vague; what is the 'eye candy' she is
> referring?
Obviously s
On Tue, 3 Aug 2004 16:02:08 +0200 (CEST) Peter Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(Bbabbled:
(B
(B> On Tue, 3 Aug 2004, Cristalle Azundris Sabon wrote:
(B> > Let's see whether we agree on the basics then, shall we.
(B> > Looking at OSNews, the comments from the E-team, as far as they can
(B> >
On Tue, 3 Aug 2004, Cristalle Azundris Sabon wrote:
> Let's see whether we agree on the basics then, shall we.
> Looking at OSNews, the comments from the E-team, as far as they can
> easily be identified, are +1 Informative. The Eugenia's comments
> -1 Troll. If we agree this far, then it
Helo team.
yours know this project Metisse?
is possible add in DR-17 suport to this?
http://insitu.lri.fr/~chapuis/metisse/
=
___
Yahoo! Acesso Grátis - navegue de graça com conexão de qualidade! Ac
> > b) I have never read anything of Eugenia's that I didn't consider crap.
>
> yeah, i thought it was universally understood that Eugenia is a fucking
> moron ?
This upsets me on so many levels.
Let me just be frank and say that this sort of trolling is what gives OSS
advocates a bad reputation
Eugenia said:
>All I have to say about Enlightenment is that it's
unusable.
>Visual Usability is really thrown out of the window
in favor of >eye candy.
Eugenia says "Enlightenment". But the subject that
started the thread is "Enlightenment Foundation
Libraries Preview Release". Correct me if I
11 matches
Mail list logo
