On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 21:58:17 +0100 Tilman Sauerbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> Sebastian Dransfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-17 18:54]:
> > Implemented desktops as a list, instead of an array. Moved
> > e_desk_current_get, e_desk_at_xy_get to e_zone_desk_current_get and
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 22:52:39 +0100 Tilman Sauerbeck
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: :
> Embryo looks for it in $EDJE_PREFIX/edje/data/include.
> $EDJE_PREFIX is the prefix Edje is installed in ;)
>
> This should work out-of-the-box; did you move Edje after the
> installation? Did you install from CVS/
Antonio Palladini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-17 19:38]:
> It looks like, edje_cc adds the line #include to the tmp-file but
> cannot find it to load.
>
> Where is this file located or have i to put it in ?
Embryo looks for it in $EDJE_PREFIX/edje/data/include.
$EDJE_PREFIX is the prefix Edje i
ahem!!!
Sebastian Dransfeld wrote:
Implemented desktops as a list, instead of an array. Moved
e_desk_current_get, e_desk_at_xy_get to e_zone_desk_current_get and
e_zone_desk_at_xy_get.
Anyone against?
YES!!!
It is an array for efficiency - was decided by raster when I implemented
it - we talked
This appears only to happen to eterm and only when using
double-buffering.
Eterm --double-buffer
while true; do cat /etc/passwd; sleep 0.1; done
(You might have to adjust 0.1 for your locale)
Partially cover the window in some way.
--> CPU usage on X shoots to near 100%
Uncover the window
--> C
Sebastian Dransfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-17 18:54]:
> Implemented desktops as a list, instead of an array. Moved
> e_desk_current_get, e_desk_at_xy_get to e_zone_desk_current_get and
> e_zone_desk_at_xy_get.
>
> Anyone against?
You should wait for raster and Andy to comment on this, IIR
I could be wrong, but I can't think of any major benefits of having it as
a list.
The array keeps it small in size and simple. What can a list do for it?
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, robotron:2084 wrote:
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 18:54:19 +0100, Sebastian Dransfeld
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Implemented desk
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 18:54:19 +0100, Sebastian Dransfeld
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Implemented desktops as a list, instead of an array. Moved
> e_desk_current_get, e_desk_at_xy_get to e_zone_desk_current_get and
> e_zone_desk_at_xy_get.
>
> Anyone against?
>
i am not necessarily against this mov
Hello list,
I have done a GUI with edje, but got the above error message.
I have tracked it down to the following minimal code :
group
{
name: "Seneca_Main";
min: 800 600;
max: 1152 864;
script
{
}
}
if i compile it with :
strace edje_
Implemented desktops as a list, instead of an array. Moved
e_desk_current_get, e_desk_at_xy_get to e_zone_desk_current_get and
e_zone_desk_at_xy_get.
Anyone against?
Sebastian
Index: e/src/bin/e_border.c
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/enlig
10 matches
Mail list logo
