On Wednesday, 20 August 2008, at 09:30:30 (+1000),
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> i do know this... (solaris vs linux (null) output). the thing is... it's
> debugging output - and solaris traditionally has never had hald/dbus and thus
> this hasn't mattered. :)
I didn't know you wrote that code; I *kn
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:47:52 -0700 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Tuesday, 19 August 2008, at 22:04:43 (+0200),
> _doof wrote:
>
> > i find why enlightenment_fm segfault but i dont have the answer
> >
> > in e_fm_main.c, line 586
> >
> > 586printf("++STO:\n udi: %s\n b
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Brian 'morlenxus' Miculcy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> why has evfs been moved to OLD? PROTO/entropy depends on it, should
> entropy also moved to OLD or is someone still working on it?
after some discussion about evfs on #edevelop, we agreed th
yes i 'm on solaris :)
i find a bad workaround which is to disable the device in hal .
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 23:47, Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday, 19 August 2008, at 22:04:43 (+0200),
> _doof wrote:
>
>> i find why enlightenment_fm segfault but i dont have the answer
On Tuesday, 19 August 2008, at 22:04:43 (+0200),
_doof wrote:
> i find why enlightenment_fm segfault but i dont have the answer
>
> in e_fm_main.c, line 586
>
> 586printf("++STO:\n udi: %s\n bus: %s\n drive_type: %s\n
> model: %s\n vendor: %s\n serial: %s\n icon.drive: %s\n
> icon.volu
hi
i find why enlightenment_fm segfault but i dont have the answer
in e_fm_main.c, line 586
586printf("++STO:\n udi: %s\n bus: %s\n drive_type: %s\n
model: %s\n vendor: %s\n serial: %s\n icon.drive: %s\n
icon.volume: %s\n\n", s->udi, s->bus, s->drive_type, "s->model",
s->vendor, s->ser
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Cedric BAIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Cedric BAIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 3:15 AM, Jose Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Just to make it clear what I think about this: This kind of thing i
Hello everyone,
why has evfs been moved to OLD? PROTO/entropy depends on it, should
entropy also moved to OLD or is someone still working on it?
Greets,
Brian
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Develope
Subject says it all. The html code is gone, but the pdf versions are
still around. I suspect its from the cvs/svn move. I spoken to mekius
about it and he thinks there will be a script somewhere but doesnt
know where it would be. Anyone know much about this?
Toma
-
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Cedric BAIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 3:15 AM, Jose Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Just to make it clear what I think about this: This kind of thing is
>> something that really needs to be done, one way or another. :)
>>
>>
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:41:52 +1000 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 00:32:16 +0200 "Kim Woelders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> babbled:
>
> > On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:42:19 +0200, Michael Jennings
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Monday, 18 Augu
Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 3:15 AM, Jose Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Just to make it clear what I think about this: This kind of thing is
>> something that really needs to be done, one way or another. :)
>>
>> Some time back, I thought about having the edje
12 matches
Mail list logo
