Hi again,
Ok, I'm attaching a new patch. Read comments below.
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Sung W. Park sung...@gmail.com wrote:
comments here: :)
evas_gl_context.patch:
yup! in. i just never handled the y invert case (or lets say.. the
non-inverted
case). i just never encountered
Dear Elementary developers.
In elm_entry, some markup converting functions' return value should be
freed.
- (elm_entry_markup_to_utf8, and elm_entry_utf8_to_markup)
I think it's good to be in the functions' comment.
Thank you.
--
Hyoyoung CHANG
Engineer
Hi,
Can someone give me access to move stuff into /var/www/download/releases/ on
e2? I need to move some dist tbs for eeze 1.0.1, and they're in my homedir on
e2.
Thanks
--
Mike Blumenkrantz
Zentific: NULL pointer dereferences now 50% off!
Am Sun, 13 Mar 2011 20:20:39 -0300 schrieb Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri:
It just provides two IN signals to show and hide a view and edje
provides two OUT signals to tell my application when it's finished
shown or hidden. So I couldn't use your editje provided signals as
they have a name that
I forgot to do a reply all in my last reply. Anyway... I'll continue on
with the
discussion.
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Sung W. Park sung...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi~
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.comwrote:
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011 17:33:00 +0900 Sung W.
Hey,
No, it is not in svn yet. I am not sure that this is the correct way to
solve the problem. AFAIK there is a problem with the API of gnutls and
the warning we obtain occurs in all codes using this function. Further
research on the web indicate that the correct (but ugly) way of
Thank you very much :)
2011. 3. 14. 오후 6:19에 Enlightenment SVN no-re...@enlightenment.org님이 작성:
Log:
Edje part-text: Updated docs.
Author: tasn
Date: 2011-03-14 02:19:05 -0700 (Mon, 14 Mar 2011)
New Revision: 57733
Trac: http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/57733
Thank you for letting me know about those :)
(Luckily I was bored at the airport).
--
Tom.
On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 18:25 +0900, Jihoon Kim wrote:
Thank you very much :)
--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and
In SVN, thanks.
Also added another commit that adds some attributes to those functions
that state they allocate data and the return result is important.
--
Tom.
On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 15:29 +0900, Hyoyoung Chang wrote:
Dear Elementary developers.
In elm_entry, some markup converting
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:15:07AM +0100, Mathieu Taillefumier wrote:
- gnutls_transport_set_ptr(cl-session, (gnutls_transport_ptr_t)cl-fd);
+ gnutls_transport_set_ptr(cl-session,(gnutls_transport_ptr_t)(long)
cl-fd);
s/long/uintptr_t/ you mean.
Joerg
On 03/14/2011 01:42 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:15:07AM +0100, Mathieu Taillefumier wrote:
- gnutls_transport_set_ptr(cl-session, (gnutls_transport_ptr_t)cl-fd);
+ gnutls_transport_set_ptr(cl-session,(gnutls_transport_ptr_t)(long)
cl-fd);
s/long/uintptr_t/ you
Hi, here are the corrected patches. I hope I did not forget anything.
2011/3/10 Tristan Lelong tristan.lel...@blunderer.org:
Ok, I correct all these and I'll submit patches again.
Thx for the feedback.
Le jeudi 10 mars 2011, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com a écrit :
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011
Efreet in the latest svn source does not seem to work correctly on MacOS 10.6.
Parts of it work, but efreet_desktop_cache_create is segfaulting. I'm not
passing any optional flags to ./autogen.sh when I build efreet. e17 seems to
run ok anyway but I need to stop the segfaulting.
Any help very
On 03/14/2011 06:01 PM, Dave Ray wrote:
Efreet in the latest svn source does not seem to work correctly on MacOS
10.6. Parts of it work, but efreet_desktop_cache_create is segfaulting. I'm
not passing any optional flags to ./autogen.sh when I build efreet. e17 seems
to run ok anyway but I
My mistake, sorry. efreet_icon_cache_create is segfaulting, as shown in my
previous email.
--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in
Hey,
I was wondering if adding the newest modules to the 1.0 branch would be
allowed. What do you guys think about that ?
Vincent
--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 21:35:11 +0100 (CET)
Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
Hey,
I was wondering if adding the newest modules to the 1.0 branch would be
allowed. What do you guys think about that ?
Vincent
If there's a good reason for it, but I think we are gearing up for 1.1
me too, I think all new evas loaders don't needed to be backported to 1.0
branch.
They must appear only for 1.1 relaease. It's a new feature.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Mike Blumenkrantz m...@zentific.com
Date: 2011/3/14
Subject: Re: [E-devel] adding newest loaders to evas 1.0
18 matches
Mail list logo
