Hey,
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 3:22 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi wrote:
Doing some simple changes to enjoy resulted in lots of bugs with
genlist... who is using it for more than a simple demo? Seems totally
unusable for real work usage :-(
Aside from previous bug that
On Sat, 7 Jan 2012 03:39:23 -0800
Enlightenment SVN no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
Ecore-con: Let's not break compilation if net/if.h is not found (or old
system)
Author: kakaroto
Date: 2012-01-07 03:39:23 -0800 (Sat, 07 Jan 2012)
New Revision: 66956
Trac:
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Enlightenment SVN
no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
Edje: hide an object after unswallow
Simply doing an unswallow would leave the object where it was in the
evas, visible, but edje would not be handling it anymore.
nah, you're supposed to do this in the
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 23:38:55 +1000 David Seikel onef...@gmail.com said:
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 16:43:29 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jan 2012 21:09:19 +1000 David Seikel onef...@gmail.com
said:
how will the lua be able to detect the api call
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 19:47:16 +0100 Andreas Volz li...@brachttal.net said:
u.. you know aspect: X X2 is:
aascpet: MINIMUM MAXIMUM;
and they are width/wight... you are making maximum LESS than minimum... :)
Hello,
I just noticed that edje has a problem regarding aspect calculation.
It
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 19:56:25 +0100 Andreas Volz li...@brachttal.net said:
Am Thu, 5 Jan 2012 05:55:32 -0500 schrieb Michael Blumenkrantz:
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 08:01:52 +0100
Andreas Volz li...@brachttal.net wrote:
Am Wed, 4 Jan 2012 17:20:01 -0500 schrieb Michael Blumenkrantz:
On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 20:32:30 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 23:38:55 +1000 David Seikel onef...@gmail.com
said:
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 16:43:29 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jan 2012
On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 20:23:50 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 19:56:25 +0100 Andreas Volz li...@brachttal.net
said:
Am Thu, 5 Jan 2012 05:55:32 -0500 schrieb Michael Blumenkrantz:
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 08:01:52 +0100
Andreas Volz
2012/1/7 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri barbi...@profusion.mobi:
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Enlightenment SVN
no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
Edje: hide an object after unswallow
Simply doing an unswallow would leave the object where it was in the
evas, visible, but edje would not be
On Sat, 7 Jan 2012 18:16:04 +
Iván Briano (Sachiel) sachi...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/1/7 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri barbi...@profusion.mobi:
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Enlightenment SVN
no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
Edje: hide an object after unswallow
Simply doing an
Am Fri, 6 Jan 2012 20:18:07 +0900 schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The
Rasterman):
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 19:47:16 +0100 Andreas Volz li...@brachttal.net
said:
u.. you know aspect: X X2 is:
aascpet: MINIMUM MAXIMUM;
and they are width/wight... you are making maximum LESS than
minimum... :)
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 01:55:49 +1000 David Seikel onef...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 20:32:30 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 23:38:55 +1000 David Seikel onef...@gmail.com
said:
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 16:43:29 +0900 Carsten
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 06:53:04 +1000 David Seikel onef...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 01:55:49 +1000 David Seikel onef...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 20:32:30 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 23:38:55 +1000 David
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz
michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 7 Jan 2012 18:16:04 +
Iván Briano (Sachiel) sachi...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/1/7 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri barbi...@profusion.mobi:
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Enlightenment SVN
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Andreas Volz li...@brachttal.net wrote:
Am Fri, 6 Jan 2012 20:18:07 +0900 schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The
Rasterman):
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 19:47:16 +0100 Andreas Volz li...@brachttal.net
said:
u.. you know aspect: X X2 is:
aascpet: MINIMUM MAXIMUM;
and
@Gustavo: I understand your point about leaks but I'd expect a developer to
not need a visual aid for him to write proper code. Not leaking is standard
programing knowledge, so it's not about being novice in using the EFL.
My issue is that I don't want to destroy the objects, just hide them
No, on the ps3 :)
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz
michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 7 Jan 2012 03:39:23 -0800
Enlightenment SVN no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
Ecore-con: Let's not break compilation if net/if.h is not found (or old
system)
On Sat, 7 Jan 2012 20:51:35 -0500
Youness Alaoui kakar...@kakaroto.homelinux.net wrote:
No, on the ps3 :)
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz
michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 7 Jan 2012 03:39:23 -0800
Enlightenment SVN no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 06:53:04 +1000 David Seikel onef...@gmail.com said:
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 01:55:49 +1000 David Seikel onef...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 20:32:30 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 23:38:55 +1000 David
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 07:04:38 +1000 David Seikel onef...@gmail.com said:
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 06:53:04 +1000 David Seikel onef...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 01:55:49 +1000 David Seikel onef...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 20:32:30 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
On Sat, 7 Jan 2012 20:50:26 -0500 Youness Alaoui
kakar...@kakaroto.homelinux.net said:
the real issue here is, leak-wise, that there is no tool to help u find such
leaks as the object will never appear in any leak checker as it is tracked by
evas anyway. :( (nb - unswallow == edje releases
Understood, but I don't consider this behavior as a tool :p
I don't know about others who use unswallow, but in my case, the unswallow
was happening after an animation put the part in a 0x0 geometry state, so
it wasn't visible anyways.
Either way, what do you think the behavior should be? should I
On Sat, 7 Jan 2012 21:27:13 -0500 Youness Alaoui
kakar...@kakaroto.homelinux.net said:
well i lean towards leaving it as is. i do see your point though. and well the
previous behaviour was a helpful indicator visually. we don't have any way to
detect orphaned objects since ownership falls back
Yes, I understand what you mean.
Both opinion have their own reasons. I was so confused when I first
unswallowed my object :(
Even I agree with both opinions, how about just letting them as is and
just document it?
reason1. As Gustavo and Raster said, this is a warning that we have to
handle
I still personally see it as just confusing and an abnormal behavior, and
it wasn't helpful at all in finding leaks (because in my case the
unswallow happens after the part is 0x0, so the glitch/artifact only
happened on race conditions).
I will wait for cedric/gustavo's opinion on this, if one
25 matches
Mail list logo
