On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 11:32:15 +0900 Cedric BAIL cedric.b...@free.fr said:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:55 PM, Carsten Haitzler - Enlightenment
Git no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
raster pushed a commit to branch master.
commit 116013320a941357a925441928ea7e10ed6c0ebd
Author: Carsten
Hi all,
This morning, I pushed the Eo pointers indirection feature. As I wrote
in the log, it is not API break. It will help us against bad usage of Eo
objects pointers, e.g access an object that has already been deleted...
So if you see that the Eo* that you receive from eo_add doesn't seem
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Rafael Antognolli antogno...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda
noo...@noorul.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Cedric BAIL cedric.b...@free.fr
wrote:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Noorul Islam
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 2:06 AM, ChunEon Park her...@naver.com wrote:
zmike, How about using EINA_TRUE/EINA_FALSE?
much more typing I guess.
let's start converting to C99's bool that's already more than a decade
over? One simple advantage is less type, another is that the compiler
will do the
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 09:33:47 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 2:06 AM, ChunEon Park her...@naver.com
wrote:
zmike, How about using EINA_TRUE/EINA_FALSE?
much more typing I guess.
let's start converting to C99's bool that's already more
Why do we provide Eina_Bool?
Why did zmike delcare the variable as Eina_Bool type?
How about suggesting the names a, b, c, d, e .. for much less typing?
The suggestion was for the readability.
-Regards, Hermet-
-Original Message-
From: Lucas De
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 9:42 AM, David Seikel onef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 09:33:47 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 2:06 AM, ChunEon Park her...@naver.com
wrote:
zmike, How about using EINA_TRUE/EINA_FALSE?
much more
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 4:02 AM, Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda
noo...@noorul.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Rafael Antognolli
antogno...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda
noo...@noorul.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 5:34 PM,
Elementary and Enlightenment don't have their own repositories, so you
just have to checkout the correct tag/branch.
I do not understand this. Can you tell me what exactly needed to be done?
Or is there a script which will help me to get the latest version and
compile.
Ah, now I understand
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 2:52 PM, ChunEon Park her...@naver.com wrote:
Why do we provide Eina_Bool?
Because some compiler don't support yet bool. I am thinking especially
on some windows one and as some of those Eina_Bool end up in our API
for consistency with use Eina_Bool everywhere in our
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 09:56:25 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 9:42 AM, David Seikel onef...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 09:33:47 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 2:06 AM, ChunEon
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Cedric BAIL cedric.b...@free.fr wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 2:52 PM, ChunEon Park her...@naver.com wrote:
Why do we provide Eina_Bool?
Because some compiler don't support yet bool. I am thinking especially
some? The only compiler that doesn't have native
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 10:51:23 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Cedric BAIL cedric.b...@free.fr
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 2:52 PM, ChunEon Park her...@naver.com
wrote:
Why do we provide Eina_Bool?
Because some compiler
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 4:18 PM, David Seikel onef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 10:51:23 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Cedric BAIL cedric.b...@free.fr
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 2:52 PM, ChunEon Park
Hey, as agreed I'm renaming edbus to eldbus.
I did it in efl and enlightenment. Attached is the script used. I
don't know what are the projects using it, so please apply the
attached script to your project.
I usually check with git grep -i edbus to check if there are any
missing references and
On 23/04/13 16:55, Tom Hacohen wrote:
On 23/04/13 16:34, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
Hey, as agreed I'm renaming edbus to eldbus.
I did it in efl and enlightenment. Attached is the script used. I
don't know what are the projects using it, so please apply the
attached script to your project.
I
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com wrote:
On 23/04/13 16:55, Tom Hacohen wrote:
On 23/04/13 16:34, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
Hey, as agreed I'm renaming edbus to eldbus.
I did it in efl and enlightenment. Attached is the script used. I
don't know what are the
Hi,
I did enjoy it!
even if I'wd prefered a pointer then ID_TABLE macro,
just a matter of taste I suppose ;)
a question,
what did you based your 32 and 64 bits decomposition on?
equations, benchmarks, moon's CxA ?
regards
Jérémy
On Tuesday 23 April 2013 09:59, daniel.za...@samsung.com wrote :
a simple request
enable syntax highlighting in cgit
It would ease my daily reading
Jérémy
--
Try New Relic Now We'll Send You this Cool Shirt
New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Tom Hacohen tom.hacohen@... wrote:
On 23/04/13 16:55, Tom Hacohen wrote:
On 23/04/13 16:34, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
Hey, as agreed I'm renaming edbus to eldbus.
I did it in efl and enlightenment. Attached is the script used. I
don't know what are the projects
Hi Jeremy,
On 04/24/2013 12:00 AM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
Hi,
I did enjoy it!
even if I'wd prefered a pointer then ID_TABLE macro,
just a matter of taste I suppose ;)
I did it because it was too much with the
_eo_ids_tables[table_id][int_table_id], I mean not readable. But I am
sure it can
21 matches
Mail list logo
