On Viernes 17 Diciembre 2010 04:15:40 Jesse Charbneau escribió:
> Hello,
> I’ve been working off list with Gustavo, and we’d like to get some
> feedback on the design thats been worked out.
>
> http://e-www.thecharbneaus.com/p.php?p=about&l=en
I like it. It might have too much text for my perso
On Domingo 14 Noviembre 2010 04:24:21 Jesse Charbneau escribió:
> Hello,
> I have modified the contribute and support pages. Please review and let
> me know if I’m heading in the right direction or not. Basically shifted
> things to a single frame layout, removed some items others had proposed
Sorry Gustavo I know this is offtopic, I'll try to be brief.
On Martes 09 Noviembre 2010 01:10:51 Ian Caldwell escribió:
> here's what we in all honesty Have to do. We need to ignore all the current
> date, better yet move to e.org/old and we need to recreate a completely
> BRAND new website, don'
On Domingo 15 Agosto 2010 14:33:06 Joerg Sonnenberger escribió:
> edje:
> The second paragraph is non-OSI and some parts are weird, e.g. the file
> doesn't actually contain a copyright notice. I think the 2-clause BSD
> license covers the intention and is OSI approved, but that's your call.
Edje's
On Lunes 02 Agosto 2010 21:29:22 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri escribió:
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Mike McCormack
wrote:
> > Leif Middelschulte wrote:
> >> The reason that led to this poll was the idea of an inofficial GIT
> >> mirror of the SVN, discussed amongst some devs using GIT. It might
bug reports and so on we didnt get to fix for 1.0.0 and holding
> off on major feature stuff... then we can begin the slid in of new things.
> for 1.1 etc. etc.
>
> > On Martes 27 Julio 2010 21:34:04 Carsten Haitzler escribió:
> > > On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:09:14 -0300 A
On Martes 27 Julio 2010 21:34:04 Carsten Haitzler escribió:
> On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:09:14 -0300 Andres Blanc
> said:
>
> you're back? :) hmm i quite like the old header... what do people think?
> the black selection misses a shadow - it needs some depth. and the whole
> b
Hello there, the current site header always bottered me since it was based on
something I half-did a long time ago and I've been wanting to fix it.
Homepage with the mouse over about: http://i.imgur.com/IhjjZ.png
The actual about page: http://i.imgur.com/MLGxv.png
Tested in ie6 and ready to go a
Thanks Toma, Cedric and João for your kind words. My previous mail seems to
have been too melodramatic. I'm not ragequitting the project.
I just wanted to make clear that and why I cannot be "in charge" of any
mid/long term task until I get my shit together for a sustainable amount of
time. I D
I forgot to say, don't pay much attention to the README files scattered around.
While they contain some nice ideas and some information/links (SITEMAP has some
content that could be used as well) they are largely outdated in respect at
what was my final goals were after talking with k-s and rast
It should be obvious to you by now that I cannot be trusted.
But before the whining part and excuses these are the resources I just
committed that might be useful to anyone working with the site:
dev/lib/
Most of the php code is hastly made crap and copy pasted, ignore it, it
just was s
On Lunes 22 Febrero 2010 11:57:29 buergi escribió:
> Hello,
> i don't know if this is the right place to ask the following question,
> but can anyone tell me why the trac wiki shows the attachments global on
> every wiki page instead of only below the article to which I attached
> them?
>
> I thou
Before anyone else spends a second creating or editing existing website or
wiki content we need to sort this project's face out. The current website(s)
and wiki(s) are a mess, to continue to add content without sorting this out is
simply a waste of time. As I see it we have three veins:
1. Project
On Domingo 13 Diciembre 2009 04:42:56 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri escribió:
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 5:35 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
> >> that needs to go. trac news isnt used.
> >
> > are you sure ? I use it, Gustavo too.
> >
> > Planet is also used but it is not mentioned in the web site.
>
> trac
I honestly don't see the need of having *everything* integrated, except for a
unified authentication system and maintenance
I see the need of an agile way of update information on the website (a wiki),
exchange opinions and support (a forum), and a formal channel for users to
present problems t
I would recommend against Drupal for forums, they don't look good, they lack
basic functionality in many browsers, the search function doesn't work very
well, and yet remain complex to maintain.
My recomendation would be RForum (http://rforum.andreas-s.net/rforum).
That merges the froum with the
16 matches
Mail list logo
