Oops, apparently you've sent this answer only to me and it's been
sitting on my inbox for a few days. CC'ing the list back.
At Tue, 19 Oct 2010 11:30:02 +0900,
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 22:55:49 -0200 Raphael Kubo da Costa k...@profusion.mobi
said:
At
At Sun, 17 Oct 2010 22:49:16 +0900,
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Sun, 17 Oct 2010 07:51:14 -0200 Raphael Kubo da Costa k...@profusion.mobi
said:
At Sun, 17 Oct 2010 13:48:09 +0900,
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
this is actually a good q... shouldnt it be
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
At Sun, 17 Oct 2010 22:49:16 +0900,
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Sun, 17 Oct 2010 07:51:14 -0200 Raphael Kubo da Costa
k...@profusion.mobi
said:
At Sun, 17 Oct 2010 13:48:09 +0900,
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
At Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:43:59 +0200 (CEST),
Vincent Torri wrote:
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
At Sun, 17 Oct 2010 22:49:16 +0900,
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Sun, 17 Oct 2010 07:51:14 -0200 Raphael Kubo da Costa
k...@profusion.mobi
said:
At
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
At Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:43:59 +0200 (CEST),
Vincent Torri wrote:
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
At Sun, 17 Oct 2010 22:49:16 +0900,
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Sun, 17 Oct 2010 07:51:14 -0200 Raphael Kubo
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:29:24 -0200 Raphael Kubo da Costa k...@profusion.mobi
said:
Sorry, I've kind of missed the point while reading your message ;)
Are you saying we should use an unsigned long even though it will be
read as a long by curl, or that we shoulduse POSTFIELDSIZE_LARGE, or
At Tue, 19 Oct 2010 08:26:37 +0900,
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:29:24 -0200 Raphael Kubo da Costa k...@profusion.mobi
said:
Sorry, I've kind of missed the point while reading your message ;)
Are you saying we should use an unsigned long even though
On Sun, 17 Oct 2010 13:48:09 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
this is actually a good q... shouldnt it be unsigned long at any
rate? (tho to be honest int is probably enough... but as u have to
send in 1 go... 2gb might possibly be a limiting factor?)
Say you
At Sun, 17 Oct 2010 13:48:09 +0900,
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
this is actually a good q... shouldnt it be unsigned long at any rate? (tho to
be honest int is probably enough... but as u have to send in 1 go... 2gb might
possibly be a limiting factor?)
We have libcurl as a
On Sun, 17 Oct 2010 07:51:14 -0200 Raphael Kubo da Costa k...@profusion.mobi
said:
At Sun, 17 Oct 2010 13:48:09 +0900,
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
this is actually a good q... shouldnt it be unsigned long at any rate? (tho
to be honest int is probably enough... but as u have
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 18:53:19 -0300 Raphael Kubo da Costa k...@profusion.mobi
said:
this is actually a good q... shouldnt it be unsigned long at any rate? (tho to
be honest int is probably enough... but as u have to send in 1 go... 2gb might
possibly be a limiting factor?)
This signature change
This signature change follows libcurl's behaviour more closely:
CURLOPT_POSTFIELDSIZE expects a long, and a value of -1 means that
content length calculation is forwarded to libcurl, which performs a
strlen() on CURLOPT_POSTFIELD.
---
src/lib/ecore_con/Ecore_Con.h |2 +-
12 matches
Mail list logo
