Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] evas-framebuffer.pc.in rename

2008-04-11 Thread Vincent Torri
On Mon, 7 Apr 2008, Lars Munch wrote: Hi Unfortunately the addition off expedite_check_engine.m4 in expedite broke the detection of the framebuffer engine in expedite. The course of this is an inconsistent naming of the file evas-framebuffer.pc.in which should be named evas-fb.pc.in to be

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] evas-framebuffer.pc.in rename

2008-04-11 Thread Lars Munch
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 04:27:18PM +0200, Vincent Torri wrote: On Mon, 7 Apr 2008, Lars Munch wrote: Hi Unfortunately the addition off expedite_check_engine.m4 in expedite broke the detection of the framebuffer engine in expedite. The course of this is an inconsistent naming of the

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] evas-framebuffer.pc.in rename

2008-04-11 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:27:18 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: On Mon, 7 Apr 2008, Lars Munch wrote: Hi Unfortunately the addition off expedite_check_engine.m4 in expedite broke the detection of the framebuffer engine in expedite. The course of this is an

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] evas-framebuffer.pc.in rename

2008-04-11 Thread The Rasterman
On Mon, 7 Apr 2008 18:31:02 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Munch) babbled: Hi Unfortunately the addition off expedite_check_engine.m4 in expedite broke the detection of the framebuffer engine in expedite. The course of this is an inconsistent naming of the file evas-framebuffer.pc.in which

[E-devel] [PATCH] evas-framebuffer.pc.in rename

2008-04-07 Thread Lars Munch
Hi Unfortunately the addition off expedite_check_engine.m4 in expedite broke the detection of the framebuffer engine in expedite. The course of this is an inconsistent naming of the file evas-framebuffer.pc.in which should be named evas-fb.pc.in to be consistent with the other engine names. The