On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 14:13:03 +0100 Stefan Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
babbled:
in cvws they go! thanks mucho! :)
On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 15:19, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 22:46:27 +0100 Stefan Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
babbled:
hey stefan... can you send the patches attached
On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 15:19, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 22:46:27 +0100 Stefan Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
babbled:
hey stefan... can you send the patches attached to a mail - not inlined?
Sure. I attached all patches to this mail. No difference to the
earlier ones.
mailers
On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 22:46:27 +0100 Stefan Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
babbled:
hey stefan... can you send the patches attached to a mail - not inlined?
mailers like to linewrap and such. by sending as attachments you'll make sure
that we get the patches exactly as you generated them whitespace for
Hello.
This is the first patch with some small fixes for e_nm and stuff I
found on my way working on it.
Nothing really nice yet, but I like to get the patchset down instead
of posting all at once and nobody like to review such a big set.
From my understanding e_nm was started, but not used in
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 6:46 PM, Stefan Schmidt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
This is the first patch with some small fixes for e_nm and stuff I
found on my way working on it.
Nothing really nice yet, but I like to get the patchset down instead
of posting all at once and nobody like to
Hello.
On Sat, 2008-03-01 at 19:14, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 6:46 PM, Stefan Schmidt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) I completely kick all non-working functions in one shot and start
from the still working stuff.
This is the best option given the current
