On Thu, 29 Sep 2016 09:50:19 -0700 Cedric BAIL said:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 8:38 AM, Davide Andreoli
> wrote:
> > I'm starting this new thread to further discuss promises, thus the tag
> > [YetAnotherPromiseThread] :)
>
> :-)
>
> > It seems to me we are putting too much ideas/discu
On Thu, 29 Sep 2016 17:38:17 +0200 Davide Andreoli
said:
> I'm starting this new thread to further discuss promises, thus the tag
> [YetAnotherPromiseThread] :)
>
> It seems to me we are putting too much ideas/discussion in the other
> threads in a so sparse way that is starting to be difficult
On Thu, 29 Sep 2016 17:30:11 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
> On 29/09/16 17:03, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> > Next mainloop iteration is essential to make user code "always work", no
> > special cases.
> >
> > This was in my other thread commentary about "resolved promise", that is,
> > to return
On Thu, 29 Sep 2016 12:57:24 -0300 Felipe Magno de Almeida
said:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Davide Andreoli
> wrote:
> > I'm starting this new thread to further discuss promises, thus the tag
> > [YetAnotherPromiseThread] :)
>
> [snip]
>
> > The topic here is: do we really want to all
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 8:38 AM, Davide Andreoli wrote:
> I'm starting this new thread to further discuss promises, thus the tag
> [YetAnotherPromiseThread] :)
:-)
> It seems to me we are putting too much ideas/discussion in the other
> threads in a so sparse way that is starting to be diff
On 29/09/16 17:03, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> Next mainloop iteration is essential to make user code "always work", no
> special cases.
>
> This was in my other thread commentary about "resolved promise", that is,
> to return a promise with a well known (resolved) value
I completely agree,
Next mainloop iteration is essential to make user code "always work", no
special cases.
This was in my other thread commentary about "resolved promise", that is,
to return a promise with a well known (resolved) value
Em quinta-feira, 29 de setembro de 2016, Felipe Magno de Almeida <
felipe.m.alme
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Felipe Magno de Almeida
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Davide Andreoli
> wrote:
>> I'm starting this new thread to further discuss promises, thus the tag
>> [YetAnotherPromiseThread] :)
>
> [snip]
>
>> The topic here is: do we really want to allow ins
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Davide Andreoli
wrote:
> I'm starting this new thread to further discuss promises, thus the tag
> [YetAnotherPromiseThread] :)
[snip]
> The topic here is: do we really want to allow instant resolution of
> promises?
> For "instant resolution" I mean a promise th
I'm starting this new thread to further discuss promises, thus the tag
[YetAnotherPromiseThread] :)
It seems to me we are putting too much ideas/discussion in the other
threads in a so sparse way that is starting to be difficult to follow the
discussions and to understand when we found some agreem
10 matches
Mail list logo
