Re: [E-devel] Conf dialogs... modules?!

2007-07-10 Thread Thomas Gstädtner
Additional to the categories it would be great to (de)activate all modules in a category with one click. So the category should get the same checkboxes like the modules have right now. Maybe a advanced dialog could be useful to separate user-modules (tclock, cpu, ...) from system-modules (borders,

Re: [E-devel] Conf dialogs... modules?!

2007-07-08 Thread Brian 'morlenxus' Miculcy
I also suggest to have module categories, as we already use the module.desktop files for the icons, we should use it for the categories. This way we wouldn't have a long list, we instead have the modules more organised in category lists. It would be also cool to have the description directly in

Re: [E-devel] Conf dialogs... modules?!

2007-07-08 Thread Luchezar Petkov
Ok. Feeling a bit stupid... But, I'm convinced. After all, i just wanted a few arguments. :-) 2007/7/8, Brian 'morlenxus' Miculcy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I also suggest to have module categories, as we already use the module.desktop files for the icons, we should use it for the categories. This

[E-devel] Conf dialogs... modules?!

2007-07-07 Thread Luchezar Petkov
Raster, why the heck are you doing this? I don't like the idea (and its not only me, of course)... At least explain us :-) -- Luchezar P. Petkov http://luchko.wordpress.com - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express

Re: [E-devel] Conf dialogs... modules?!

2007-07-07 Thread Hisham Mardam Bey
On 7/7/07, Luchezar Petkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Raster, why the heck are you doing this? I don't like the idea (and its not only me, of course)... At least explain us :-) This is actually not a very bad idea, its actually a good move towards refactoring a lot of E's code and making it

Re: [E-devel] Conf dialogs... modules?!

2007-07-07 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On 7/7/07, Luchezar Petkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Raster, why the heck are you doing this? I don't like the idea (and its not only me, of course)... At least explain us :-) I still have to talk to raster about this, but I think it's due we pushing E for embedded devices. At least I want to

Re: [E-devel] Conf dialogs... modules?!

2007-07-07 Thread Brian Mattern
On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 01:40:37AM +0300, Hisham Mardam Bey wrote: On 7/7/07, Luchezar Petkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Raster, why the heck are you doing this? I don't like the idea (and its not only me, of course)... At least explain us :-) This is actually not a very bad idea, its

Re: [E-devel] Conf dialogs... modules?!

2007-07-07 Thread The Rasterman
On Sat, 7 Jul 2007 20:04:43 +0300 Luchezar Petkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: explain why you don't like it? Raster, why the heck are you doing this? I don't like the idea (and its not only me, of course)... At least explain us :-) -- Luchezar P. Petkov http://luchko.wordpress.com

Re: [E-devel] Conf dialogs... modules?!

2007-07-07 Thread The Rasterman
On Sun, 8 Jul 2007 01:40:37 +0300 Hisham Mardam Bey [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: On 7/7/07, Luchezar Petkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Raster, why the heck are you doing this? I don't like the idea (and its not only me, of course)... At least explain us :-) This is actually not a very bad

Re: [E-devel] Conf dialogs... modules?!

2007-07-07 Thread The Rasterman
On Sat, 7 Jul 2007 19:57:51 -0500 Brian Mattern [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 01:40:37AM +0300, Hisham Mardam Bey wrote: On 7/7/07, Luchezar Petkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Raster, why the heck are you doing this? I don't like the idea (and its not only me, of

Re: [E-devel] Conf dialogs... modules?!

2007-07-07 Thread The Rasterman
On Sat, 7 Jul 2007 20:11:09 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: On 7/7/07, Luchezar Petkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Raster, why the heck are you doing this? I don't like the idea (and its not only me, of course)... At least explain us :-) I still have to talk to