Then I made a mistake :)
S.
On 01/18/2012 09:50 PM, Davide Andreoli wrote:
> 2012/1/18 Sebastian Dransfeld:
>> I guess this is the wrong fix.
>>
>> The problem I was fixing (if I remember correctly) is that if you unload
>> a module, the gadman will segv as the underlying code is gone.
>
> hmm, I
2012/1/18 Sebastian Dransfeld :
> I guess this is the wrong fix.
>
> The problem I was fixing (if I remember correctly) is that if you unload
> a module, the gadman will segv as the underlying code is gone.
hmm, I can't reproduce here loading and unloading modules that have
active gadgets, they di
>From my perspective, this restores the functionality of gadman. For the
past year, gadman was completely useless because one would lose all gadgets
on resolution changes.
http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/ticket/687
On Wednesday, January 18, 2012 6:01:44 PM UTC+8, Sebastian Dransfeld wrote:
>
>
I guess this is the wrong fix.
The problem I was fixing (if I remember correctly) is that if you unload
a module, the gadman will segv as the underlying code is gone.
S.
On 01/16/2012 10:54 PM, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
> Log:
> Revert a 13 months old commit by englebass
>
>Messagge was:
>
