On Fri, 7 Dec 2012 12:06:33 -0200 Bruno Dilly
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz
> wrote:
> > while (emotion_bugs != fixed) spank(antognolli);
>
> while (1) spank(antognolli);
while (is_svn_Borked()) spank(antognolli);
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Enligh
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz
wrote:
> while (emotion_bugs != fixed) spank(antognolli);
while (1) spank(antognolli);
=D
>
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Enlightenment SVN <
> no-re...@enlightenment.org> wrote:
>
>> Log:
>> Fix Elm's build. antognolli += spank.
>>
>>
>
while (emotion_bugs != fixed) spank(antognolli);
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Enlightenment SVN <
no-re...@enlightenment.org> wrote:
> Log:
> Fix Elm's build. antognolli += spank.
>
>
>
> Author: glima
> Date: 2012-12-07 05:54:38 -0800 (Fri, 07 Dec 2012)
> New Revision: 80455
> T
But we had compat layer at that time.
Compat layer does not solve this?
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoX)
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 11:02 PM, Gustavo Lima Chaves
wrote:
> * Michael Blumenkrantz [2012-12-05
> 13:56:22 +]:
>
> > yes...when I use that in the 1.7 branch I get the error:
> > ERR<9102>:eleme
http://i.imgur.com/L3J6n.jpg
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Gustavo Lima Chaves wrote:
> * Michael Blumenkrantz [2012-12-05
> 13:56:22 +]:
>
> > yes...when I use that in the 1.7 branch I get the error:
> > ERR<9102>:elementary elm_scroller.c:734 elm_scroller_policy_set() Passing
> > object
* Michael Blumenkrantz [2012-12-05 13:56:22
+]:
> yes...when I use that in the 1.7 branch I get the error:
> ERR<9102>:elementary elm_scroller.c:734 elm_scroller_policy_set() Passing
> object (0xf736e0) of type 'entry' in function elm_scroller_policy_set, but
> it doesn't implement the Eleme
yes...when I use that in the 1.7 branch I get the error:
ERR<9102>:elementary elm_scroller.c:734 elm_scroller_policy_set() Passing
object (0xf736e0) of type 'entry' in function elm_scroller_policy_set, but
it doesn't implement the Elementary scrollable interface.
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Gu
* Michael Blumenkrantz [2012-12-05 13:39:31
+]:
> this reminds me: how is scroller policy set on entry widgets now?
You mean elm_scroller_policy_set()? By issuing it? :)
>
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Enlightenment SVN <
> no-re...@enlightenment.org> wrote:
>
> > Log:
> > [elm] Remo
this reminds me: how is scroller policy set on entry widgets now?
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Enlightenment SVN <
no-re...@enlightenment.org> wrote:
> Log:
> [elm] Remove unused file.
>
> els_scroller.c -> I forgot to dump it after my refactoring.
>
>
>
> Author: glima
> Date:
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Gustavo Lima Chaves
wrote:
> * Vincent Torri [2012-09-05 22:04:01 +0200]:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:43 PM, Enlightenment SVN
>> wrote:
>> > Log:
>> > [elm] It won't hurt to have it here.
>>
>> wrong assumption : on Windows, including the headers here and ther
* Vincent Torri [2012-09-05 22:04:01 +0200]:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:43 PM, Enlightenment SVN
> wrote:
> > Log:
> > [elm] It won't hurt to have it here.
>
> wrong assumption : on Windows, including the headers here and there
> can break compilation. I don't know if that commit breaks compila
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:43 PM, Enlightenment SVN
wrote:
> Log:
> [elm] It won't hurt to have it here.
wrong assumption : on Windows, including the headers here and there
can break compilation. I don't know if that commit breaks compilation,
but remember that for the future
Vincent
>
> Less i
@since, NEWS, changelog
Vincent
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Enlightenment SVN
wrote:
> Log:
> [elm] Prepare for removal of last widget using
>internal scrolling smart cbs.
>
>
>
>
> Author: glima
> Date: 2012-08-30 09:45:34 -0700 (Thu, 30 Aug 2012)
> New Revision: 75892
>
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Enlightenment SVN
wrote:
> Log:
> [elm] Handle focus out on spinner the right way.
Thanks :-) I was thinking of something more like this but wasn't able
to properly make it work.
--
Cedric BAIL
-
changelog and news entries, eh? like you did in 73537? :D
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 12:48 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
> How can you still forget the usual stuff WHEN ADDING API :
>
> fuck, add @since and changelog and NEWS.
>
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 11:40 PM, Enlightenment SVN
> wrote:
How can you still forget the usual stuff WHEN ADDING API :
fuck, add @since and changelog and NEWS.
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 11:40 PM, Enlightenment SVN
wrote:
> Log:
> [elm] Bug fixing on scroller.
>
> We had an inconsistency of two missing getters, that would "leak" API
> deprec
Oops, I missed that.
Sorry for the question.
Thanks, I'm getting to know your new elementary well.
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 10:57 PM, Gustavo Lima Chaves
wrote:
> * Daniel Juyung Seo [2012-05-30 18:03:02 +0900]:
>
>> Hello glima,
>> I have a small question here while rea
* Daniel Juyung Seo [2012-05-30 18:03:02 +0900]:
> Hello glima,
> I have a small question here while reading the code.
>
> struct _Elm_Bg_Smart_Data
> {
>Elm_Layout_Smart_Data base;
>
> Why Elm_Bg_Smart_Data has base? It looks like sd->base is never used.
> It's same for other widgets.
Hi
On Tue, 29 May 2012 11:10:59 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
said:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 May 2012 14:15:26 +0900 Daniel Juyung Seo
> > said:
> >
> > it's not a break, but it does add warnings to apps. they may decide to
> > handle those warni
Hello glima,
I have a small question here while reading the code.
struct _Elm_Bg_Smart_Data
{
Elm_Layout_Smart_Data base;
Why Elm_Bg_Smart_Data has base? It looks like sd->base is never used.
It's same for other widgets.
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Enlightenme
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:26 AM, Vincent Torri
> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 4:07 AM, Daniel Juyung Seo
>> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 6:03 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
>>> wrote:
On Mon, May 2
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 02:07:24PM +0900, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
> but it breaks applications when they use -Werror option.
You can use -Wno-deprecated to selectively disable the warning or
-Wno-error=deprecated to keep the warning, but don't assert on it.
Make sure to put that after -Werror tho
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Tue, 29 May 2012 14:15:26 +0900 Daniel Juyung Seo
> said:
>
> it's not a break, but it does add warnings to apps. they may decide to handle
> those warnings as they see fit. ignore them or do something about them. if
> they
> use -Wer
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:26 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 4:07 AM, Daniel Juyung Seo
> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 6:03 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Gustavo Lima Chaves
>>> wrote:
* Enlightenment
On Tue, 29 May 2012 14:15:26 +0900 Daniel Juyung Seo
said:
it's not a break, but it does add warnings to apps. they may decide to handle
those warnings as they see fit. ignore them or do something about them. if they
use -Werror.. frankly.. that's their business. a warning added is not a break
on
Just looked API deprecation. Not API break.
-Regards, Hermet-
-Original Message-
From: "Daniel Juyung Seo"
To: "Enlightenment developer list";
Cc:
Sent: 2012-05-29 (화) 14:45:03
Subject: Re: [E-devel] E SVN: glima trunk/eleme
Oh ok then this is not API break? That's what I asked first.
> I wonder if this is API break?
If this is not API break, then I have no objection.
Thanks.
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Daniel Juyung Seo
> wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:15 AM, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
> Current trunk will be released as 1.x. isn't it?
1.7.0, indeed
> We break api even in 1.x?
did we break API ? If yes, the commit must be reverted.
Vincent
> This is different from what I've learned from open source projects.
>
> Dani
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
> but it breaks applications when they use -Werror option.
Warning tend to come and go with gcc version. It's good to use Werror
to fix them, but you can't assert that this is an API nor an ABI
incompatibilitie. It's just a warning, it bec
Current trunk will be released as 1.x. isn't it?
We break api even in 1.x?
This is different from what I've learned from open source projects.
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Daniel Juyung Seo
> wrote:
>> but it
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
> but it breaks applications when they use -Werror option.
of course as it throws a warning. But then you know that there is a
deprecated function that has not been replaced by the new function :)
Vincent
>
> Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
>
>
but it breaks applications when they use -Werror option.
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Daniel Juyung Seo
> wrote:
>> Hello glima, thanks for your job.
>> I wonder if this is API break?
>
> I just checked the pat
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 11:50 PM, Enlightenment SVN
> wrote:
>> Log:
>> [elm] Deprecate elm icon calls just wrapping elm
>> image equivalents.
>
> please update the doc too, with @deprecated :
>
> http://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/doxygen/comma
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 11:50 PM, Enlightenment SVN
wrote:
> Log:
> [elm] Deprecate elm icon calls just wrapping elm
> image equivalents.
please update the doc too, with @deprecated :
http://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/doxygen/commands.html#cmddeprecated
Vincent
>
>
>
> Author: glima
> Date:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 4:07 AM, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 6:03 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Gustavo Lima Chaves
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> * Enlightenment SVN [2012-05-28 13:35:35
>>> -0700]:
>>>
>>> > Log:
>>> > [elm] Wa
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Daniel Juyung Seo
wrote:
> Hello glima, thanks for your job.
> I wonder if this is API break?
I just checked the patch, and it seems fine. EINA_DEPRECATED only turn
on an attribute that will tell gcc to trigger a warning during
compilation (sadly it doesn't tell
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Daniel Juyung Seo
wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 6:03 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Gustavo Lima Chaves
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> * Enlightenment SVN [2012-05-28 13:35:35
>>> -0700]:
>>>
>>> > Log:
>>> > [elm] Warn about d
Hello glima, thanks for your job.
I wonder if this is API break?
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 6:50 AM, Enlightenment SVN
wrote:
> Log:
> [elm] Deprecate elm icon calls just wrapping elm
> image equivalents.
>
>
>
> Author: glima
> Date: 2012-05-28 14:50:03 -07
Hello,
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 6:03 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Gustavo Lima Chaves
> wrote:
>>
>> * Enlightenment SVN [2012-05-28 13:35:35 -0700]:
>>
>> > Log:
>> > [elm] Warn about deprecation of some icon calls
>> > The ones just wrapping their im
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Gustavo Lima Chaves
wrote:
>
> * Enlightenment SVN [2012-05-28 13:35:35 -0700]:
>
> > Log:
> > [elm] Warn about deprecation of some icon calls
> > The ones just wrapping their image counterparts should die eventually.
> > The signal callbacks on icons will die
* Enlightenment SVN [2012-05-28 13:35:35 -0700]:
> Log:
> [elm] Warn about deprecation of some icon calls
> The ones just wrapping their image counterparts should die eventually.
> The signal callbacks on icons will die, too, eventually.
Dear people,
as you can see, I have marked some icon
On 15/05/12 12:35, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
> Hello,
> elm_layout_text_set instead of elm_layout_part_text_set?
> For elm_object, we supported elm_object_part_text_set and elm_object_text_set.
But you need a name for setting the default part.
--
Tom.
-
On Sun, 13 May 2012 12:14:37 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:10 AM, Daniel Juyung Seo
> wrote:
> The problem is that some internals are completely upside down given
> the "unplanned organic growth" of elementary. If we started to create
> Elementary from scratc
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 6:19 AM, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 12:14 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:10 AM, Daniel Juyung Seo
>> wrote:
>>> Thanks for the great effort.
>>> But I have a question about this commit.
>>>
>>> It describes that
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 12:14 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:10 AM, Daniel Juyung Seo
> wrote:
>> Thanks for the great effort.
>> But I have a question about this commit.
>>
>> It describes that
>> - elm_object_xxx APIs will be deprecated later. Use elm_layout_xx
That's the idea. We also need to enhance our documentation like that.
Thanks for the link!
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 13/05/12 18:14, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>> That's the single sane way to do it, and the case for every toolkit
>> o
On 13/05/12 18:14, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> That's the single sane way to do it, and the case for every toolkit
> out there, be ObjC, C++ or C. The developer needs to understand the
> hierarchy in order to use, you can't call a method in a object that
> did not implement, but admittedly C
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:10 AM, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
> Thanks for the great effort.
> But I have a question about this commit.
>
> It describes that
> - elm_object_xxx APIs will be deprecated later. Use elm_layout_xxx APIs
> instead.
> - all elm_layout_* namespaced fuctions will function on
s/show/slow
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
> show calls for raster.
>
> Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
>
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 3:58 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 5 Mar 2012 06:32:59 -0800
>> "Enlightenment SVN" wrote:
>>
>>> Log:
>>> [Elm] I don't have wor
show calls for raster.
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 3:58 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz
wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Mar 2012 06:32:59 -0800
> "Enlightenment SVN" wrote:
>
>> Log:
>> [Elm] I don't have words to name the issue here, let's just call it
>> unb0rking.
>>
>>
>>
>> Author:
On Mon, 5 Mar 2012 06:32:59 -0800
"Enlightenment SVN" wrote:
> Log:
> [Elm] I don't have words to name the issue here, let's just call it unb0rking.
>
>
>
> Author: glima
> Date: 2012-03-05 06:32:58 -0800 (Mon, 05 Mar 2012)
> New Revision: 68722
> Trac: http://trac.e
51 matches
Mail list logo
