On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Enlightenment SVN
no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Modified: trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore/ecore_timer.c
===
--- trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore/ecore_timer.c 2012-09-18 11:34:45 UTC (rev
76804)
+++
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:40:01 +0200 Vincent Torri vincent.to...@gmail.com said:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Enlightenment SVN
no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Modified: trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore/ecore_timer.c
===
---
backport to 1.0 ?
Vincent
On Sat, 5 Nov 2011, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
fix but resulting from threadsafety addition by mike.
Author: raster
Date: 2011-11-05 23:17:56 -0700 (Sat, 05 Nov 2011)
New Revision: 64798
Trac:
On Sun, 6 Nov 2011, Vincent Torri wrote:
backport to 1.0 ?
amm, actually, no need
Vincent
On Sat, 5 Nov 2011, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
fix but resulting from threadsafety addition by mike.
Author: raster
Date: 2011-11-05 23:17:56 -0700 (Sat, 05 Nov 2011)
New
On Sun, 6 Nov 2011 07:40:38 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr
said:
no. threadsafety was not there in 1.0 - this is an issue created in 1.1 dev and
then fixed. no chlog needed
backport to 1.0 ?
Vincent
On Sat, 5 Nov 2011, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
fix but resulting
On 11/06/11 01:40, Vincent Torri wrote:
backport to 1.0 ?
Vincent
Yup Yup
dh
On Sat, 5 Nov 2011, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
fix but resulting from threadsafety addition by mike.
Author: raster
Date: 2011-11-05 23:17:56 -0700 (Sat, 05 Nov 2011)
New Revision: 64798
Good code !!! But, not EFL: Please fix this:
+ if (_ecore_main_select(0.0) | _ecore_signal_count_get())
Missing Parens...?..
dh
- Original Message -
From: Enlightenment SVN no-re...@enlightenment.org
To: enlightenment-...@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2011
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 07:03:07 + (UTC)
cpmicha...@comcast.net wrote:
Good code !!! But, not EFL: Please fix this:
+ if (_ecore_main_select(0.0) | _ecore_signal_count_get())
Missing Parens...?..
dh
- Original Message -
From: Enlightenment SVN no-re...@enlightenment.org
* Enlightenment SVN no-re...@enlightenment.org [2011-09-01 20:29:11 -0700]:
Log:
mainloop cleanups on top of previous ones and fixes for previous refactors
Fixed the issue. Thanks!
Author: raster
Date: 2011-09-01 20:29:11 -0700 (Thu, 01 Sep 2011)
New Revision: 63082
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 10:58:09 -0300 Gustavo Lima Chaves gl...@profusion.mobi
said:
* Enlightenment SVN no-re...@enlightenment.org [2011-09-01 20:29:11 -0700]:
Log:
mainloop cleanups on top of previous ones and fixes for previous refactors
Fixed the issue. Thanks!
yay++!
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
as suggested - nme it timeline
I guess that you still don't want to fill the ChangLog ?
Vincent
Author: raster
Date: 2011-04-24 07:25:43 -0700 (Sun, 24 Apr 2011)
New Revision: 58867
Trac:
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 17:46:08 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr
said:
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
as suggested - nme it timeline
I guess that you still don't want to fill the ChangLog ?
it already is filled in. remember the point of the changelog
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 03:58:58 -0800
Enlightenment SVN no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
BAD DISCOMFITOR! BROKE ecore_exe!
Author: raster
Date: 2011-01-14 03:58:58 -0800 (Fri, 14 Jan 2011)
New Revision: 56110
Trac:
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Enlightenment SVN
no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
see comment.
Author: raster
Date: 2010-11-14 01:00:24 -0800 (Sun, 14 Nov 2010)
New Revision: 54549
Modified:
trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore/ecore_thread.c
Modified:
On Sat, 18 Sep 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
warning--
Author: raster
Date: 2010-09-18 20:09:09 -0700 (Sat, 18 Sep 2010)
New Revision: 52453
Modified:
trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore/ecore_main.c
trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore/ecore_thread.c
Modified:
Now it doesn't make any sense. For SCHED_OTHER policy, the only prio allowed
is 0. What you want is to set the nice value, which is done with setpriority
call
On Sep 3, 2010 9:55 PM, Enlightenment SVN no-re...@enlightenment.org
wrote:
Log:
rr-other
Author: raster
Date: 2010-09-03
On Sat, 4 Sep 2010 01:25:01 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi said:
according to setpriority manual it works on the process not the specific
thread within the process. yes - i know on linux threads are implemented AS
processes - but as such pthread doesnt explicitly say that
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 11:29 PM, Enlightenment SVN
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+/**
+ * Retrieves the time at which the last loop stopped waiting for timeouts or
events
+ *
+ * This gets the time (since Jan 1st, 1970, 12:00AM) that the main loop
ceased
+ * waiting for timouts and/or events
On Sun, 2 Nov 2008 12:58:46 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
[EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 11:29 PM, Enlightenment SVN
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+/**
+ * Retrieves the time at which the last loop stopped waiting for timeouts
or events
+ *
+ * This gets the time (since
19 matches
Mail list logo
