On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 12:34:28 +0900
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 22:28:44 -0500 Christopher Michael
cpmicha...@comcast.net said:
On 11/11/11 21:49, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 21:00:23 -0500 Christopher
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 07:53:02 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr
said:
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 20:08:09 -0500 Christopher Michael
cpmicha...@comcast.net said:
On 11/11/11 19:54, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
On 11/11/11 19:54, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
back to unsigned long. code was actually correct as-is.
If that's actually correct, then the 'fix' for the xcb version should be
reverted also ;)
dh
Author: raster
Date: 2011-11-11 16:54:22 -0800 (Fri, 11 Nov 2011)
New
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 20:08:09 -0500 Christopher Michael cpmicha...@comcast.net
said:
On 11/11/11 19:54, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
back to unsigned long. code was actually correct as-is.
If that's actually correct, then the 'fix' for the xcb version should be
reverted also ;)
yeah
On 11/11/11 20:42, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 20:08:09 -0500 Christopher Michaelcpmicha...@comcast.net
said:
On 11/11/11 19:54, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
back to unsigned long. code was actually correct as-is.
If that's actually correct, then the 'fix'
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 21:00:23 -0500 Christopher Michael cpmicha...@comcast.net
said:
On 11/11/11 20:42, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 20:08:09 -0500 Christopher
Michaelcpmicha...@comcast.net said:
On 11/11/11 19:54, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
back to
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 22:28:44 -0500 Christopher Michael cpmicha...@comcast.net
said:
On 11/11/11 21:49, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 21:00:23 -0500 Christopher
Michaelcpmicha...@comcast.net said:
On 11/11/11 20:42, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011, Christopher Michael wrote:
On 11/11/11 19:54, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
back to unsigned long. code was actually correct as-is.
If that's actually correct, then the 'fix' for the xcb version should be
reverted also ;)
so, as I said, the last argument of the XCB
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 20:08:09 -0500 Christopher Michael
cpmicha...@comcast.net
said:
On 11/11/11 19:54, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
back to unsigned long. code was actually correct as-is.
If that's actually correct, then
On Tue, 3 May 2011, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
fix segv! wow. data was null.
are you sure that you'll be able to find all the fixes that need o be
back ported to 1.0 ??
Vincent
Author: raster
Date: 2011-05-03 02:46:55 -0700 (Tue, 03 May 2011)
New Revision: 59144
On Tue, 3 May 2011 11:54:31 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr
said:
i was sitting in a text console without x. i havent written the changelog yet.
On Tue, 3 May 2011, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
fix segv! wow. data was null.
are you sure that you'll be able to find
On 03/31/2011 06:36 AM, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
ahem! who put unused there? who? screen *IS* used!
For once, it wasn't me ;)
Disco Stu
dh
Author: raster
Date: 2011-03-31 03:36:20 -0700 (Thu, 31 Mar 2011)
New Revision: 58224
Trac:
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Peter Johnson t...@hiddenrock.com wrote:
Ping?
Would it be more convenient to send the patch and test programs directly to
the list? (I know people usually do this, but since it's a number of files, I
figured it might be cumbersome.)
Sorry! I did forget
Ping?
Would it be more convenient to send the patch and test programs directly to
the list? (I know people usually do this, but since it's a number of files, I
figured it might be cumbersome.)
pete
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 09:51:01PM -0500, Peter Johnson wrote:
Here's a tarball containing a
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 3:02 AM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:01:02 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi said:
because eina_log doesnt do what i want. i'm busy tracking down issues not
trying to get a gold star for using eina (which
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:23:19 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi said:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 3:02 AM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com
wrote:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:01:02 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi said:
because eina_log doesnt do
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:23:19 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi said:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 3:02 AM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com
wrote:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:01:02 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 3:03 AM, Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:23:19 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi said:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 3:02 AM, Carsten Haitzler
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 03:11:35 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi said:
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 3:03 AM, Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:23:19 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Enlightenment SVN
no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
add lots of logging functions - for trackign x overhead when u cant get
symbols... booo! - disabled of course.
damn raster, if you take so much time to do all this work, why don't
you take 5 minutes
really, there is already logging infrastructure there in ecore-x, if
he wants another domain, just create a new one and name macros
differently, but use the standards and let's not require people to
change private.h to define or not the debug :-/
Where is this documented?
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, Peter Johnson wrote:
really, there is already logging infrastructure there in ecore-x, if
he wants another domain, just create a new one and name macros
differently, but use the standards and let's
Cool, thanks.
My reading of those pages indicates that, were I to follow the recommendations
contained therein, I would always use the EINA_LOG_DOM_*() macros and never
the EINA_LOG_*() macros, because they use EINA_LOG_DOMAIN_GLOBAL, and as a
good developer I should have my own domain(s) for my
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, Peter Johnson wrote:
really, there is already logging infrastructure there in ecore-x, if
he wants another domain, just create a new one and name macros
differently, but use the standards and let's not require people to
change private.h to define or not the debug :-/
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Enlightenment SVN
no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
add lots of logging functions - for trackign x overhead when u cant get
symbols... booo! - disabled of course.
damn raster, if you take so much
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Peter Johnson t...@hiddenrock.com wrote:
Cool, thanks.
My reading of those pages indicates that, were I to follow the recommendations
contained therein, I would always use the EINA_LOG_DOM_*() macros and never
the EINA_LOG_*() macros, because they use
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Enlightenment SVN
no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
add lots of logging functions - for trackign x overhead when u cant get
Here's a tarball containing a prospective patch and a few commented test
programs:
http://tam.hiddenrock.com/eina-log-default.tar.gz
I haven't yet updated the documentation because I'm not entirely convinced
it's correct, but I'm not sure why, so I'd like a few second pairs of eyes on
it.
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:01:02 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi said:
because eina_log doesnt do what i want. i'm busy tracking down issues not
trying to get a gold star for using eina (which doesnt do what i want - i DONT
want any code there if its turned off - no fn call -
Hello, Raster.
ecore_x_events.c has some troubles here. :-(.
The output log is attached.
[]'s
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 11:33 PM, Enlightenment SVN
no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
opcode - _ecore_x_xi2_opcode
Author: raster
Date: 2010-01-16 17:33:43 -0800 (Sat, 16 Jan
On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 00:36:19 -0200 Fabiano Fidêncio fiden...@profusion.mobi
said:
fixed. i got myself some xi2 headers now.
Hello, Raster.
ecore_x_events.c has some troubles here. :-(.
The output log is attached.
[]'s
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 11:33 PM, Enlightenment SVN
31 matches
Mail list logo
