On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:09:35 +0100 Stefan Schmidt s.schm...@samsung.com said:
that's ok. i think this is just expected to never fail as the tool is a tool we
made and ships with cpufreq. :) chance of failure is... basically nil :)
Hello.
Raster or anyone else worked with this code please
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:22:30 +0100 Stefan Schmidt s.schm...@samsung.com said:
Hello.
On 06/14/2012 11:21 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:09:35 +0100 Stefan Schmidts.schm...@samsung.com
said:
that's ok. i think this is just expected to never fail as
Hello.
Raster or anyone else worked with this code please review if this patch
jumps to the right places for error handling. Especially if we want to
continue reading other sources after a fgets error. I would think so but
some other eyes would help.
regards
Stefan Schmidt
On 06/12/2012 11:01
