On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 17:09:57 -0500 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Wednesday, 25 January 2006, at 10:10:23 (+0900),
> Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>
> > you solved a problem the WRONG way. instead of removing 50+ lines of
> > spec file - you shoudl have added 5 or so lines in total
On Wednesday, 25 January 2006, at 10:10:23 (+0900),
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> you solved a problem the WRONG way. instead of removing 50+ lines of
> spec file - you shoudl have added 5 or so lines in total to a few
> other spec files listing extra dependencies.
I felt I was better equipped to tak
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:10:23 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 14:33:25 -0500 Michael Jennings
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
> > On Tuesday, 24 January 2006, at 10:23:57 (+0900),
> > Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> >
> > > evidence is borken any
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 16:00:21 -0500 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Tuesday, 24 January 2006, at 14:58:28 (-0600),
> Brian Mattern wrote:
>
> > The .eet loader should be all that's needed. The buffer engine isn't
> > even required for normal edje usage. (It is in some apps that
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 14:33:25 -0500 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Tuesday, 24 January 2006, at 10:23:57 (+0900),
> Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>
> > believe it or not - redhat is like the #3 most used OS for "embedded"
> > products
> > - yes.. redhat! fedora is #6 most popular - a
On Tuesday, 24 January 2006, at 14:58:28 (-0600),
Brian Mattern wrote:
> The .eet loader should be all that's needed. The buffer engine isn't
> even required for normal edje usage. (It is in some apps that do
> fancy things like make thumbnails of edjes).
And yet it doesn't make sense to build in
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 13:33, Michael Jennings wrote:
>
> But let me ask this: Once an .edc file has been turned into an .edj
> file, what modules are required at runtime to load the images in those
> files, if any? Is it enough to have those modules (esp.
> engine-buffer) at build time?
The
On Tuesday, 24 January 2006, at 10:23:57 (+0900),
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> believe it or not - redhat is like the #3 most used OS for "embedded" products
> - yes.. redhat! fedora is #6 most popular - accor4ding to linuxdevices:
>
> http://www.linuxdevices.com/articles/AT4036830962.html
Among li
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 15:51:13 -0500 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Monday, 23 January 2006, at 23:54:16 (+0900),
> Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>
> > yes - it doesnt. funny that there are a few hundred thousand lines
> > of code that need work on - a lot of packages like edje when t
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 13:41:33 -0500 Jason Tackaberry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 21:15 +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > dependencies even if they arene't using e17 or e apps (just using evas for
> > some specific fucntionality like a dvd/pvr system - eg freevo, where it o
On Monday, 23 January 2006, at 23:54:16 (+0900),
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> yes - it doesnt. funny that there are a few hundred thousand lines
> of code that need work on - a lot of packages like edje when they
> build dont check for certain support. the bug u saw was a matter of
> the code basical
Modularization is a touchy thing... I was very pro
this for evas some months ago, even to the point where I
wrote a fairly modular version of it..
I never sent any of it for several reasons -- some
are not relevant here, but in general I found quite a few
aspects that had to be de
On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 21:15 +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> dependencies even if they arene't using e17 or e apps (just using evas for
> some
> specific fucntionality like a dvd/pvr system - eg freevo, where it only
> displays in the framebuffer... just for starters.)
Actually, we (Freevo) use t
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 07:32:46 -0500 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Monday, 23 January 2006, at 21:15:24 (+0900),
> Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>
> > dude - that message says EXACTLY what the problem is - to the
> > letter. read it. the code passed NULL as a handle pointer to
> > e
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 05:44:54 -0500 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Since 99.9% of the stuff evas is used for won't work and either seg
> faults or comes up with useless error messages which don't even begin
> to point to the actual problem (like this:
dude - that message says EXAC
On Monday, 23 January 2006, at 21:15:24 (+0900),
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> dude - that message says EXACTLY what the problem is - to the
> letter. read it. the code passed NULL as a handle pointer to
> ecore_evasget() - so what it passed in was NULL - that's bad.
Well, in that case, the naughty
Since 99.9% of the stuff evas is used for won't work and either seg
faults or comes up with useless error messages which don't even begin
to point to the actual problem (like this:
*** ECORE ERROR: Ecore Magic Check Failed!!!
*** IN FUNCTION: ecore_evas_get()
Input handle pointer is NULL!
*** NA
17 matches
Mail list logo
