Re: [E-devel] Git repository layout - RFC

On 30/01/13 23:34, Jérémy Zurcher wrote: > On Wednesday 30 January 2013 11:29, Tom Hacohen wrote : >> Ok, we did the "Patch by: thing, it works. We'll do some other things >> and upload it when we are done. > > maybe you could also process the (maybe aleady part of the other things?) > > "From:

Re: [E-devel] Git repository layout - RFC

On Wednesday 30 January 2013 11:29, Tom Hacohen wrote : > On 30/01/13 01:00, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote: > >> Well, we aren't doing the switch yet. Probably early next week. But we are > >> prepping the git repos now (it takes time, a few days of

Re: [E-devel] Git repository layout - RFC

Hey, (this mail might not be of interest to those not familiar with Git) On 30/01/13 01:00, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote: >> Well, we aren't doing the switch yet. Probably early next week. But we > are >> prepping the git repos now (it takes time, a

Re: [E-devel] Git repository layout - RFC

>> > We'll take a look at solving that. Very annoying that you guys did it >> like that, but OK. :) >> >> svn doesn't differentiate author and comitter. So I'd blame svn rather >> than us. > > I'm blaming you because git-svn does it automatically when there's a > "From:" line or a Signed-off-by

Re: [E-devel] Git repository layout - RFC

On 30/01/13 12:35, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > > On Jan 30, 2013 7:33 AM, "Tom Hacohen" > wrote: > > > > On 30/01/13 01:00, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Tom Hacohen > wrote: > >>> > >>> Well, we aren't

Re: [E-devel] Git repository layout - RFC

On Jan 30, 2013 7:33 AM, "Tom Hacohen" wrote: > > On 30/01/13 01:00, Lucas De Marchi wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote: >>> >>> Well, we aren't doing the switch yet. Probably early next week. But we are >>> prepping the git repos now (it takes time, a few days of act

Re: [E-devel] Git repository layout - RFC

On 30/01/13 01:00, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote: >> Well, we aren't doing the switch yet. Probably early next week. But we are >> prepping the git repos now (it takes time, a few days of actually >> *running*). > > > sigh... days? Are you running thi

Re: [E-devel] Git repository layout - RFC

On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 09:32:46 + Tom Hacohen wrote: > On 30/01/13 01:00, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote: > >> Well, we aren't doing the switch yet. Probably early next week. > >> But we are prepping the git repos now (it takes time, a few days > >

Re: [E-devel] Git repository layout - RFC

On 30/01/13 01:00, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote: >> Well, we aren't doing the switch yet. Probably early next week. But we are >> prepping the git repos now (it takes time, a few days of actually >> *running*). > > > sigh... days? Are you running thi

Re: [E-devel] Git repository layout - RFC

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote: > Well, we aren't doing the switch yet. Probably early next week. But we are > prepping the git repos now (it takes time, a few days of actually > *running*). sigh... days? Are you running this remotely or on the same machine svn is in? Anoth

Re: [E-devel] Git repository layout - RFC

On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 21:33:45 + Tom Hacohen said: > Well, we aren't doing the switch yet. Probably early next week. But we are > prepping the git repos now (it takes time, a few days of actually > *running*). > > We'll probably upload the repos to their final resting places tomorrow or > the

Re: [E-devel] Git repository layout - RFC

Well, we aren't doing the switch yet. Probably early next week. But we are prepping the git repos now (it takes time, a few days of actually *running*). We'll probably upload the repos to their final resting places tomorrow or the day after, let them settle there for a week (while letting people p

Re: [E-devel] Git repository layout - RFC

Hi, On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote: > > On 21/01/13 18:30, Daniel Willmann wrote: > > We also started fixing the commit names (since Git uses real-name + > > email instead of username). Please review the list at: > > > > http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/wiki/GIT_Migration_Autho

Re: [E-devel] Git repository layout - RFC

On 21/01/13 18:30, Daniel Willmann wrote: > We also started fixing the commit names (since Git uses real-name + > email instead of username). Please review the list at: > > http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/wiki/GIT_Migration_Authors Last chance to update it. We will run the final scripts tomorrow.

Re: [E-devel] Git repository layout - RFC

On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote: > On 21/01/13 18:30, Daniel Willmann wrote: >> Hello, >> >> as you may have heard, Tom and I have been working on the SVN->Git >> migration. We now have a somewhat-working conversion of the merged efl tree. >> >> The goal was to keep the history

Re: [E-devel] Git repository layout - RFC

On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 14:52:46 +0900 Cedric BAIL wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Tom Hacohen > wrote: > > On 21/01/13 18:30, Daniel Willmann wrote: > >> as you may have heard, Tom and I have been working on the SVN->Git > >> migration. We now have a somewhat-working conversi

Re: [E-devel] Git repository layout - RFC

Hello, On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote: > On 21/01/13 18:30, Daniel Willmann wrote: >> as you may have heard, Tom and I have been working on the SVN->Git >> migration. We now have a somewhat-working conversion of the merged efl tree. >> >> The goal was to keep the history acro

Re: [E-devel] Git repository layout - RFC

Hello. On 22/01/13 16:38, David Seikel wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 14:15:43 + Tom Hacohen > wrote: > >> On 21/01/13 18:30, Daniel Willmann wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> as you may have heard, Tom and I have been working on the SVN->Git >>> migration. We now have a somewhat-working conversion of

Re: [E-devel] Git repository layout - RFC

On 22/01/13 16:31, David Seikel wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 12:57:27 + Stefan Schmidt > wrote: > >> Hello. >> >> On 22/01/13 12:13, David Seikel wrote: >>> On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 11:59:54 + Stefan Schmidt >>> wrote: >>> Hello. On 22/01/13 11:50, David Seikel wrote: > On T

Re: [E-devel] Git repository layout - RFC

On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 14:15:43 + Tom Hacohen wrote: > On 21/01/13 18:30, Daniel Willmann wrote: > > Hello, > > > > as you may have heard, Tom and I have been working on the SVN->Git > > migration. We now have a somewhat-working conversion of the merged > > efl tree. > > > > The goal was to keep

Re: [E-devel] Git repository layout - RFC

On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 12:57:27 + Stefan Schmidt wrote: > Hello. > > On 22/01/13 12:13, David Seikel wrote: > > On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 11:59:54 + Stefan Schmidt > > wrote: > > > >> Hello. > >> > >> On 22/01/13 11:50, David Seikel wrote: > >>> On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 10:09:33 + Daniel Willmann

Re: [E-devel] Git repository layout - RFC

On 21/01/13 18:30, Daniel Willmann wrote: > Hello, > > as you may have heard, Tom and I have been working on the SVN->Git > migration. We now have a somewhat-working conversion of the merged efl tree. > > The goal was to keep the history across the different individual > projects that make up efl a

Re: [E-devel] Git repository layout - RFC

Hello. On 22/01/13 12:13, David Seikel wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 11:59:54 + Stefan Schmidt > wrote: > >> Hello. >> >> On 22/01/13 11:50, David Seikel wrote: >>> On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 10:09:33 + Daniel Willmann >>> wrote: >>> On 01/22/2013 01:24 AM, Daniel Willmann wrote: > On M

Re: [E-devel] Git repository layout - RFC

On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 11:59:54 + Stefan Schmidt wrote: > Hello. > > On 22/01/13 11:50, David Seikel wrote: > > On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 10:09:33 + Daniel Willmann > > wrote: > > > >> On 01/22/2013 01:24 AM, Daniel Willmann wrote: > >>> On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 21:03:24 + > >>> Tom Hacohen wrot

Re: [E-devel] Git repository layout - RFC

Hello. On 22/01/13 11:50, David Seikel wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 10:09:33 + Daniel Willmann > wrote: > >> On 01/22/2013 01:24 AM, Daniel Willmann wrote: >>> On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 21:03:24 + >>> Tom Hacohen wrote: >>> I believe the reason is that Github probably censores emails when

Re: [E-devel] Git repository layout - RFC

On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 09:45:28 + Tom Hacohen wrote: > On 22/01/13 01:35, David Seikel wrote: > > On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 01:24:02 + Daniel Willmann > > wrote: > > > >> On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 21:03:24 + > >> Tom Hacohen wrote: > >> > >>> I believe the reason is that Github probably censores e

Re: [E-devel] Git repository layout - RFC

On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 10:09:33 + Daniel Willmann wrote: > On 01/22/2013 01:24 AM, Daniel Willmann wrote: > > On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 21:03:24 + > > Tom Hacohen wrote: > > > >> I believe the reason is that Github probably censores emails when > >> being viewed but unauthenticated people. I bet

Re: [E-devel] Git repository layout - RFC

On 01/22/2013 01:24 AM, Daniel Willmann wrote: > On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 21:03:24 + > Tom Hacohen wrote: > >> I believe the reason is that Github probably censores emails when >> being viewed but unauthenticated people. I bet that if you log in it >> will be fine. If not, when you clone the repo,

Re: [E-devel] Git repository layout - RFC

On 22/01/13 01:35, David Seikel wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 01:24:02 + Daniel Willmann > wrote: > >> On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 21:03:24 + >> Tom Hacohen wrote: >> >>> I believe the reason is that Github probably censores emails when >>> being viewed but unauthenticated people. I bet that if yo

Re: [E-devel] Git repository layout - RFC

On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 01:24:02 + Daniel Willmann wrote: > On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 21:03:24 + > Tom Hacohen wrote: > > > I believe the reason is that Github probably censores emails when > > being viewed but unauthenticated people. I bet that if you log in it > > will be fine. If not, when you

Re: [E-devel] Git repository layout - RFC

On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 21:03:24 + Tom Hacohen wrote: > I believe the reason is that Github probably censores emails when > being viewed but unauthenticated people. I bet that if you log in it > will be fine. If not, when you clone the repo, it should be fine. It > is correct here. Go to http:/

Re: [E-devel] Git repository layout - RFC

That's probably because you are authenticated to GitHub. Anyhow, I'm glad to see it works for you as well. :) Soon enough we'll get to the promised land... :P On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote: > Mine is ok. > Anyhow thanks for the good job :) > > Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ

Re: [E-devel] Git repository layout - RFC

Mine is ok. Anyhow thanks for the good job :) Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ) On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 6:03 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote: > I believe the reason is that Github probably censores emails when being > viewed but unauthenticated people. I bet that if you log in it will be > fine. If not, when you c

Re: [E-devel] Git repository layout - RFC

I believe the reason is that Github probably censores emails when being viewed but unauthenticated people. I bet that if you log in it will be fine. If not, when you clone the repo, it should be fine. It is correct here. On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Daniel Willmann wrote: > On 01/21/2013 07:

Re: [E-devel] Git repository layout - RFC

On 01/21/2013 07:29 PM, David Seikel wrote: > On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 18:30:57 + Daniel Willmann > wrote: > >> We also started fixing the commit names (since Git uses real-name + >> email instead of username). Please review the list at: >> >> http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/wiki/GIT_Migration_Aut

Re: [E-devel] Git repository layout - RFC

On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 18:30:57 + Daniel Willmann wrote: > Hello, > > as you may have heard, Tom and I have been working on the SVN->Git > migration. We now have a somewhat-working conversion of the merged > efl tree. > > The goal was to keep the history across the different individual > proje

[E-devel] Git repository layout - RFC

Hello, as you may have heard, Tom and I have been working on the SVN->Git migration. We now have a somewhat-working conversion of the merged efl tree. The goal was to keep the history across the different individual projects that make up efl and that got merged into it at some point. We solved th