Hans de Goede wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Saturday 14 June 2008, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 12 June 2008, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Some time ago there was a bunch of security advisories for various
> imlib2 image loaders. Some of the fixes which w
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 14 June 2008, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> On Thursday 12 June 2008, Hans de Goede wrote:
Some time ago there was a bunch of security advisories for various
imlib2 image loaders. Some of the fixes which were circulating then
ne
On Saturday 14 June 2008, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Thursday 12 June 2008, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >> Some time ago there was a bunch of security advisories for various
> >> imlib2 image loaders. Some of the fixes which were circulating then
> >> never seem to have been app
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 12 June 2008, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Some time ago there was a bunch of security advisories for various imlib2
>> image loaders. Some of the fixes which were circulating then never seem to
>> have been applied to imlib2, the attached patch includes these fixes.
On Thursday 12 June 2008, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Some time ago there was a bunch of security advisories for various imlib2
> image loaders. Some of the fixes which were circulating then never seem to
> have been applied to imlib2, the attached patch includes these fixes.
i'm pretty sure these were
Hi,
Short intro: I'm the Fedora imlib2 package maintainer.
Some time ago there was a bunch of security advisories for various imlib2 image
loaders. Some of the fixes which were circulating then never seem to have been
applied to imlib2, the attached patch includes these fixes.
Regards,
Hans