On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 00:27:39 -0500 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Sunday, 25 December 2005, at 21:02:05 (+0100),
> Michel Briand wrote:
>
> > - it's evident but it's better said than not : This Program Is
> > Designed With Users In Mind, it's not your little toy, even if
> > R
On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 23:11 +0100, Kim Woelders wrote:
> > *** IT'S A BIG, AN AMASING MISTAKE THAT CRIPLE THE RESPECT YOU OUGHT FOR THE
> > WORK YOU'VE DONE
> >
> The configuration file changes are undoubtedly annoying in a highly
> customized setup when you expect things to work entirely wi
On Sunday, 25 December 2005, at 21:02:05 (+0100),
Michel Briand wrote:
> - it's evident but it's better said than not : This Program Is
> Designed With Users In Mind, it's not your little toy, even if
> Raster as it's creator, you and all contributors own the
> intellectual property, Open Sourcing
Kim Woelders a écrit :
> Michel Briand wrote:
>
>> It's amasing!
>>
>> E16 works for years, and even if I switched to Entranced one year ago,
>> I still
>> use E16 because it's a STABLE environment I can rely on.
>>
>> I use E16 on 4 computers, 2 at home and 2 at work, and I use the same
>> custom
Michel Briand wrote:
It's amasing!
E16 works for years, and even if I switched to Entranced one year ago, I still
use E16 because it's a STABLE environment I can rely on.
I use E16 on 4 computers, 2 at home and 2 at work, and I use the same
customizations for more than 6 years:
- all important
Thomas Coppi wrote:
On 12/23/05, Morten Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
screencap of the bug I see, non-essential bits clipped..
http://84.234.141.4/issue-ed.png
That
appears similiar to what I'm seeing, but I only see it with the composite
what the... what is that weird tag/url? it made s
On 12/23/05, Morten Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thomas Coppi wrote:> I belive it has to do with composite not updating sections that it doesn't> think need to be updated, but that's just a guess.>> On 12/23/05, Mark R. Bowyer <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>> On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 12:48, Morten N
Thomas Coppi wrote:
I belive it has to do with composite not updating sections that it doesn't
think need to be updated, but that's just a guess.
On 12/23/05, Mark R. Bowyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 12:48, Morten Nilsen wrote:
Mark R. Bowyer wrote:
I can stick with 0.1
I have a successful build of this on *BSD and Gentoo machine(s). So I
can't complain. And I love staring at the code in an attempt to fix
things.
Michel Briand wrote:
It's amasing!
E16 works for years, and even if I switched to Entranced one year ago, I still
use E16 because it's a STABL
I belive it has to do with composite not updating sections that it doesn't think need to be updated, but that's just a guess.On 12/23/05, Mark R. Bowyer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 12:48, Morten Nilsen wrote:
> Mark R. Bowyer wrote:> > I can stick with 0.17 if this can't be fix
On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 12:48, Morten Nilsen wrote:
> Mark R. Bowyer wrote:
> > I can stick with 0.17 if this can't be fixed. There are a few
> > annoyances with the way the title bar sometimes gets corrupted that
> > appear to be a lot better in pre1, but otherwise, I can't use the
> > composite st
Mark R. Bowyer wrote:
I can stick with 0.17 if this can't be fixed. There are a few
annoyances with the way the title bar sometimes gets corrupted that
appear to be a lot better in pre1, but otherwise, I can't use the
composite stuff, and never see any crashes, so...
hmm.. I've seen the titleb
> On 12/21/05, Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It can still be found here:
> > http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/e/en/enlightenment
> > Could you please try that as well?
The link's there, but none of the mirrors appear to still have the file
=O(
So I moved as
Bradley Reed wrote:
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 01:31:20 +0100
Michel Briand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
*** SO I WONDER WHY YOU HAVE CHANGED THE CONFIG FILE STRUCTURE AND
SYNTAX RECENTLY
*** IT'S A BIG, AN AMASING MISTAKE THAT CRIPLE THE RESPECT YOU OUGHT
FOR THE WORK YOU'VE DONE
You are an
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 01:31:20 +0100
Michel Briand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's amasing!
>
> E16 works for years, and even if I switched to Entranced one year
> ago, I still use E16 because it's a STABLE environment I can rely on.
>
> Users that want to USE their computer to do some duty work
It's amasing!
E16 works for years, and even if I switched to Entranced one year ago, I still
use E16 because it's a STABLE environment I can rely on.
I use E16 on 4 computers, 2 at home and 2 at work, and I use the same
customizations for more than 6 years:
- all important features are keybinded
X86 systems have both Xorg and Xsun installed, as they both provide a
different hardware driver set. I'm using Xorg 6.9 (almost the final
release) on my laptop, as that's what rolled into the last OpenSolaris
release.
But on SPARC there's no need for Xorg, as all of Sun's supported
graphics cards
IIRC, SunRay's require using Xsun still. So he wouldn't have the composite extension available, but Xorg is often installed so it may be compiled with support for composite.On 12/21/05,
Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mark R. Bowyer wrote:> On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 21:26, Kim Woelders wrote:>
Mark R. Bowyer wrote:
On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 21:26, Kim Woelders wrote:
On Solaris Nevada on my x64 laptop, it works fine. On a SunRay running
off a SPARC-based server running the same Solaris release, with both
0.20 and now this pre1, on starting I'd get the split screen, the 2
progress meters
On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 21:26, Kim Woelders wrote:
> > On Solaris Nevada on my x64 laptop, it works fine. On a SunRay running
> > off a SPARC-based server running the same Solaris release, with both
> > 0.20 and now this pre1, on starting I'd get the split screen, the 2
> > progress meters at the to
Mark R. Bowyer wrote:
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 23:45, Kim Woelders wrote:
Bug reports are welcome.
Sorry, I can't as yet figure out if this is a bug or me...
On Solaris Nevada on my x64 laptop, it works fine. On a SunRay running
off a SPARC-based server running the same Solaris release, with
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 23:45, Kim Woelders wrote:
> Bug reports are welcome.
Sorry, I can't as yet figure out if this is a bug or me...
On Solaris Nevada on my x64 laptop, it works fine. On a SunRay running
off a SPARC-based server running the same Solaris release, with both
0.20 and now this pre
Not to take away from Kim's work, because e16 still rocks, but e17 works well on solaris. I've got it running on Solaris Express to a SunRay as well. Ben put up a set of notes on cuddletech to help address any of the issues that are not completely resolved by CVS directly.
http://cuddletech.com/por
On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 00:45 +0100, Kim Woelders wrote:
> It may be a bit late for this, e17 lurking just around the corner, but
> it looks like there still are a handful of e16 users out there.
Given that e17 still only appears to work on Linux, and not the other
Unixes out there (is that still t
24 matches
Mail list logo
