Re: [E-devel] Re: E CVS: emu mej

2006-05-27 Thread Michael Jennings
On Sunday, 28 May 2006, at 13:15:21 (+1000), David Seikel wrote: > Is this due to the emu_client script? Yep, sure is. emu is the only one with a /usr/bin/ being installed. > That's just an example client script, and the only thing that will > happen if it is not available on the installed syst

Re: [E-devel] Re: E CVS: emu mej

2006-05-27 Thread David Seikel
On Sat, 27 May 2006 22:47:46 -0400 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday, 28 May 2006, at 12:39:48 (+1000), > David Seikel wrote: > > > I have no spec-fu, so I would like to know what's going on here. > > Fair enough that the emu modules spec file needed to change, but why > > d

Re: [E-devel] Re: E CVS: emu mej

2006-05-27 Thread Michael Jennings
On Sunday, 28 May 2006, at 12:39:48 (+1000), David Seikel wrote: > I have no spec-fu, so I would like to know what's going on here. > Fair enough that the emu modules spec file needed to change, but why > did every other module need to change as well? Module spec files are auto-generated from a c

[E-devel] Re: E CVS: emu mej

2006-05-27 Thread David Seikel
On Sat, 27 May 2006 19:41:12 -0400 (EDT) Enlightenment CVS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The emu module kinda threw everything for a loop by having a separate > binary, so I had to add some spec-fu to make an exception for it. I have no spec-fu, so I would like to know what's going on here. Fair