On Wednesday, 15 December 2004, at 00:45:13 (+0100),
Andreas Volz wrote:
> I don't know how to handle this language problem. At first I used
> setlocale (LC_ALL, NULL); to get the current locale for help. This
> worked well on my and most other systems. But then someone reported
> me a problem tha
Am Wed, 15 Dec 2004 21:34:46 +0100 schrieb Kim Woelders:
> You need to figure out the language to get the correct translation
> (gettext, other stuff?), and the encoding which is used by X to look
> up the appropriate font. They are kind of separate but linked issues.
> Most of this should go on b
Am Wed, 15 Dec 2004 12:43:10 -0500 schrieb Michael Jennings:
> First off, it's setlocale(LC_ALL, ""), not setlocale(LC_ALL, NULL). :)
>
> Secondly, once you've done that, you cannot assume that the returned
> locale string is any particular value. From the man page:
>
> RETURN VALUE
>A
On Saturday, 11 December 2004, at 01:04:18 (-0800),
E CVS List wrote:
> Log Message:
> get locale for help from LANG instead of LC_ALL
>
> ===
> RCS file: /cvsroot/enlightenment/e16/tools/e16menuedit2/src/file.c,v
> retrieving revisi
Andreas Volz wrote:
Am Wed, 15 Dec 2004 12:43:10 -0500 schrieb Michael Jennings:
First off, it's setlocale(LC_ALL, ""), not setlocale(LC_ALL, NULL). :)
Secondly, once you've done that, you cannot assume that the returned
locale string is any particular value. From the man page:
RETURN VALUE
Am Tue, 14 Dec 2004 16:35:50 -0500 schrieb Michael Jennings:
> This doesn't seem right to me. setlocale(LC_ALL, "") is the correct,
> portable way to set up locale information so that you can subsequently
> use nl_langinfo() and friends. $LANG is not the only env var that
> comes into play with
Am Wed, 15 Dec 2004 23:40:37 +0100 schrieb Kim Woelders:
> This is the magic used by E, as you probably have seen.
> This sets up gettext and X.
> Try running "EDBUG=1 enlightenment -V". It shows the locale setup
>
> Why do you need to know the language explicitly?
The gettext stuff works witho
On Sunday 25 July 2004 06:36 pm, Kim Woelders wrote:
> You can blame me. I thought it would be nicer to collect tools like this
> in e16/tools/ in stead of in e16/. I also wasn't sure we wanted to wipe
> out the old one(s) yet.
isnt that the point of cvs ? :)
you never really wipe out old ones if
On Monday, 26 July 2004, at 18:47:45 (-0400),
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> isnt that the point of cvs ? :)
> you never really wipe out old ones if you commit over them ...
Bingo. Somebody give that guy a cookie. :)
Michael
--
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Sunday 25 July 2004 06:36 pm, Kim Woelders wrote:
> You can blame me. I thought it would be nicer to collect tools like this
> in e16/tools/ in stead of in e16/. I also wasn't sure we wanted to wipe
> out the old one(s) yet.
isnt that the point of cvs ? :)
you never really wipe out old ones if
Michael Jennings wrote:
On Sunday, 25 July 2004, at 10:21:50 (-0700),
E CVS List wrote:
Enlightenment CVS committal
Author : andreas99
Project : e16
Module : tools
Dir : e16/tools/e16menuedit2
Okay, why are we putting this in a different directory? If someone is
going to take up the reigns
On Sunday, 25 July 2004, at 10:21:50 (-0700),
E CVS List wrote:
> Enlightenment CVS committal
>
> Author : andreas99
> Project : e16
> Module : tools
>
> Dir : e16/tools/e16menuedit2
Okay, why are we putting this in a different directory? If someone is
going to take up the reigns, why no
12 matches
Mail list logo
