There are a variety of reasons, dan mentioned one of the big ones a
couple more are:
1. EWL pre-dates Evas (at least this version), and thus smart objects.
2. We do some interesting tricks to reduce our overhead for non-visible objects.
Both of these don't rule out a port to smart objects necess
andres wrote:
> El Wednesday 19 March 2008 19:26:18 dan sinclair escribió:
>> Currently Ewl positions widgets based on absolute coordinates. This
>> works but isn't unnecessarily optional. Thoughts on changing the
>> internals of Ewl to use parent relative placement of widgets?
>>
> I have been gi
El Wednesday 19 March 2008 19:26:18 dan sinclair escribió:
> Currently Ewl positions widgets based on absolute coordinates. This
> works but isn't unnecessarily optional. Thoughts on changing the
> internals of Ewl to use parent relative placement of widgets?
>
I have been giving this a lot of tho
