andres wrote: > El Wednesday 19 March 2008 19:26:18 dan sinclair escribió: >> Currently Ewl positions widgets based on absolute coordinates. This >> works but isn't unnecessarily optional. Thoughts on changing the >> internals of Ewl to use parent relative placement of widgets? >> > I have been giving this a lot of thought since I first read the original > mail. > It couldn't have come in a better time since we could merge this with > the "Object Layout Library" SoC idea. > > But I cannot avoid to think there are some limits and problems I cannot > visualize. For example, why didn't EWL implement the widgets as Smart > Objects? This way Evas or Edje could be used as layout engines.
You'll notice there is another SOC entry in there to finish the abstraction of Evas and Edje into engines for Ewl. The goal is that Ewl won't _require_ Evas/Edje but will be able to have other backends for it's canvas and theming. dan ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
