On Wed, 3 Jun 2020 10:55:18 +0200 Quelrond said:
> Hello!
>
>
> On 03/06/2020 09:47, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > On 02.06.20 19:10, Quelrond wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> Indeed, it is fixed now.
> >>
> >> Following the same logic, could it be possible to create Efl_One.h
> >> file
Hello.
On 03.06.20 10:55, Quelrond wrote:
Hello!
On 03/06/2020 09:47, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
Hello
On 02.06.20 19:10, Quelrond wrote:
It will be usable to create bindings for some languages. For example,
I tried to create Nim bindings, but their tool analyses headers and
EFL/Elementary
Hello!
On 03/06/2020 09:47, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
Hello
On 02.06.20 19:10, Quelrond wrote:
Hi!
Indeed, it is fixed now.
Following the same logic, could it be possible to create Efl_One.h
file with ALL headers in the same file?
I don't think this is a good idea. Let me explain why.
Hello
On 02.06.20 19:10, Quelrond wrote:
Hi!
Indeed, it is fixed now.
Following the same logic, could it be possible to create Efl_One.h file
with ALL headers in the same file?
I don't think this is a good idea. Let me explain why.
First of all the _one_ suffix is really only used to
On Wed, 27 May 2020 11:34:57 +0200 Marcel Hollerbach said:
A bit late to this thread party... but really cool work here. Thumbs up.
> Hi,
>
> after quite a big amount of work we have successfully landed this
> morning a update to our build system which enables to build efl as a
> single big
Hi!
Indeed, it is fixed now.
Following the same logic, could it be possible to create Efl_One.h file
with ALL headers in the same file?
It will be usable to create bindings for some languages. For example, I
tried to create Nim bindings, but their tool analyses headers and
EFL/Elementary
Hey,
On 28/05/2020 15:17, Marcel Hollerbach wrote:
>
> Yeah, something like that was planned in the future, or building small
> stubs without code that are just dragging in efl-one.so This way we do
> not have to worry about platforms with problems about symlinks etc.
> The problem is that the
On 27/05/2020 12:34, Marcel Hollerbach wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after quite a big amount of work we have successfully landed this
> morning a update to our build system which enables to build efl as a
> single big .so instead of multiple seperated .so's. The layout is that
> every single .so is merged
Hi,
On 5/28/20 1:32 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
On 27/05/2020 12:34, Marcel Hollerbach wrote:
Hi,
after quite a big amount of work we have successfully landed this
morning a update to our build system which enables to build efl as a
single big .so instead of multiple seperated .so's. The layout is
On 5/27/20 6:30 PM, Marcel Hollerbach wrote:
Hi,
On 5/27/20 6:23 PM, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 11:34:57AM +0200, Marcel Hollerbach wrote:
after quite a big amount of work we have successfully landed this
morning a
update to our build system which enables to build efl as
meson error
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 6:25 PM Marcel Hollerbach wrote:
>
> Is that a meson or a ninja error ?
> Can you post your build.ninja if the later ?
>
> On 5/27/20 6:15 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > meson is failing on Windows (after a pull) and without efl-one :
> >
> >
Is that a meson or a ninja error ?
Can you post your build.ninja if the later ?
On 5/27/20 6:15 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
Hello
meson is failing on Windows (after a pull) and without efl-one :
ERROR: Multiple producers for Ninja target
Hi,
On 5/27/20 6:23 PM, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 11:34:57AM +0200, Marcel Hollerbach wrote:
after quite a big amount of work we have successfully landed this morning a
update to our build system which enables to build efl as a single big .so
instead of multiple seperated
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 11:34:57AM +0200, Marcel Hollerbach wrote:
> after quite a big amount of work we have successfully landed this morning a
> update to our build system which enables to build efl as a single big .so
> instead of multiple seperated .so's. The layout is that every single .so is
Hello
meson is failing on Windows (after a pull) and without efl-one :
ERROR: Multiple producers for Ninja target
"C:_Documents_msys2_home_vincent.torri_gitroot_64_efl2_src_modules_evas_image_loaders_eet_evas_image_load_eet.c.obj".
Please rename your targets.
Vincent
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at
Hi,
yep, that is a missed dependency, I think i know what went wrong. Will
merge a fix tomorrow. :)
Thank you a lot for the report,
bu5hm4n
On 5/27/20 4:25 PM, Quelrond wrote:
Hi,
Trying to build on FreeBSD with the new option:
[1959/4907] Compiling C object
Hi,
Trying to build on FreeBSD with the new option:
[1959/4907] Compiling C object
'src/bin/elementary/aea5856@@elementary_test@sha/test_efl_gfx_vg_value_provider.c.o'
FAILED:
src/bin/elementary/aea5856@@elementary_test@sha/test_efl_gfx_vg_value_provider.c.o
cc
Hi,
after quite a big amount of work we have successfully landed this
morning a update to our build system which enables to build efl as a
single big .so instead of multiple seperated .so's. The layout is that
every single .so is merged into efl-one.so except:
- eolian: no normal app would
18 matches
Mail list logo