All,
I've not been around here long enough to know/care _where_ tests are located.
Nor have I studied the tests in question (so I probably don't know what I'm
talking about :-) )
However I have been a developer long enough to know that ideally all tests
should be self contained.
Tests should
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010, Kim Lester wrote:
All,
I've not been around here long enough to know/care _where_ tests are located.
Nor have I studied the tests in question (so I probably don't know what I'm
talking about :-) )
However I have been a developer long enough to know that ideally all
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 09:11 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote :
tests are for developpers, not packagers
That is terribly wrong. Packagers care about testsuites for one simple reason:
as thoroughly as developers may be testing the code, that will never guarantee
proper behaviour on the system on which
Am 19.12.2010 04:51, schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman):
On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 17:14:02 +0100 Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org said:
Attached is a build log with the failures.
ok. since your position is that tests should work even if u enable them and
they cant connect to a display, or
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 10:28:20 +0100 Albin Tonnerre lu...@debian.org said:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 09:11 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote :
tests are for developpers, not packagers
That is terribly wrong. Packagers care about testsuites for one simple reason:
as thoroughly as developers may be testing
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:26:21 +0100 Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org said:
Am 19.12.2010 04:51, schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman):
On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 17:14:02 +0100 Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org said:
Attached is a build log with the failures.
ok. since your position is that
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 22:14 +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 10:28:20 +0100 Albin Tonnerre lu...@debian.org said:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 09:11 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote :
tests are for developpers, not packagers
That is terribly wrong. Packagers care about testsuites
Am 19.12.2010 14:16, schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman):
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:26:21 +0100 Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org said:
Am 19.12.2010 04:51, schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman):
On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 17:14:02 +0100 Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org said:
packagers should test
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010, Albin Tonnerre wrote:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 09:11 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote :
tests are for developpers, not packagers
That is terribly wrong. Packagers care about testsuites for one simple reason:
as thoroughly as developers may be testing the code, that will never
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 19:49 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote :
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010, Albin Tonnerre wrote:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 09:11 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote :
tests are for developpers, not packagers
That is terribly wrong. Packagers care about testsuites for one simple
reason:
as
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 20:02 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote :
I understand users not listening or unwilling to fix the suite to fit their
needs is a pain, but let's not make it an even greater pain for people who
just
want to use it and manage to. Things have improved a lot as far as packaging
is
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 15:29:36 +0100 Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org said:
Am 19.12.2010 14:16, schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman):
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:26:21 +0100 Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org said:
Am 19.12.2010 04:51, schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman):
On Sat, 18 Dec
On 12/19/2010 09:26 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
test the package. As already said, tests should not require external services
like X to run and if
some tests need such a service, they should be skipped or there should be an
option to skip them.
You want to verify EFL, which is all about
On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 17:14 +0100, Thomas Sachau wrote :
Attached is a build log with the failures.
Are you by any chance building on a headless machine, or in a tty ? If so, that
failure is expected - the test fails whenever ecore can't reach the X server. I
ended up disabling this test
hey
On Sat, 18 Dec 2010, Thomas Sachau wrote:
Attached is a build log with the failures.
thanks for the log, but:
1) configure gcc to display english messages
2) please strip the log so that it contains the usefull messages
3) if it's about DSO (i looked at the log and it is too huge to
On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 17:14:02 +0100 Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org said:
Attached is a build log with the failures.
gentoo ebuild problem - not ecore. pay closer attention to what failed and have
a think about it :)
--
- Codito, ergo sum - I code, therefore I am --
The
On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 17:14:02 +0100 Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org said:
Attached is a build log with the failures.
ok. since your position is that tests should work even if u enable them and
they cant connect to a display, or that we need to go fine-graining tests just
so you can --enable
17 matches
Mail list logo
