Oh and btw, the problem that I see with using e's current
notion of profile as a means to define such a shell-skin
bundle, is that the current notion of a profile is either too small
if you mean just the config data file, or too big if you mean
the entire directory.
As Cedric succinctly
Um, so it's like engage, but with a cock? Er I meant clock.
==
Ah yes, more than just engage then. Is there an URL to this rosa linux
you mention?
==
We must concede that it's certainly pushing the bleeding edge
of user interfaces
On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 12:31:45 +0300 المسالم المسالمة
almusalimalmusali...@gmail.com wrote:
Um, so it's like engage, but with a cock? Er I meant clock.
==
Ah yes, more than just engage then. Is there an URL to this rosa
linux you mention?
المسالم المسالمة wrote:
Um, so it's like engage, but with a cock? Er I meant clock.
==
Ah yes, more than just engage then. Is there an URL to this rosa linux
you mention?
==
We must concede that it's certainly
On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 17:07:57 -0500 Jose Gonzalez jose_...@juno.com said:
المسالم المسالمة wrote:
Um, so it's like engage, but with a cock? Er I meant clock.
==
Ah yes, more than just engage then. Is there an URL to this rosa linux
you mention?
Carsten wrote:
.
The point you should be embracing is not to force people to only
accept e17's current 'old-fashioned' idea, or your cocky one, or some
osx clone, or some gnomic notion, etc... but to empower designers
such as yourself with the ability to do more than just show some gif.
