Hello.
Either during the merge of ecore into efl or during Gustavos changes the
std=c99 passing to ecore_con got missing.
I just found it while compiling with clang. No time right now to dig
into this so only the report here. Added it to my local cflags for now.
regards
Stefan Schmidt
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Stefan Schmidt s.schm...@samsung.com wrote:
Hello.
Either during the merge of ecore into efl or during Gustavos changes the
std=c99 passing to ecore_con got missing.
adding std=c99 is a BAD idea. Better use AC_PROG_CC_C99 if a c99
compiler is needed. But
Hello.
On 06/12/12 10:34, Vincent Torri wrote:
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Stefan Schmidt s.schm...@samsung.com wrote:
Hello.
Either during the merge of ecore into efl or during Gustavos changes the
std=c99 passing to ecore_con got missing.
adding std=c99 is a BAD idea. Better use
so it's a problem with clang. Fix your CC, then
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Stefan Schmidt s.schm...@samsung.com wrote:
Hello.
On 06/12/12 10:34, Vincent Torri wrote:
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Stefan Schmidt s.schm...@samsung.com
wrote:
Hello.
Either during the merge of ecore
Hello.
On 06/12/12 11:57, Vincent Torri wrote:
so it's a problem with clang. Fix your CC, then
Thanks, its not my CC. I have a way to build it for my cases.
regards
Stefan Schmidt
--
LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Vincent Torri vincent.to...@gmail.comwrote:
so it's a problem with clang. Fix your CC, then
Is it really?
dns_rr_foreach is defined as for (struct dns_rr_i DNS_PP_XPASTE(i,
__LINE__) = *dns_rr_i_new((P), __VA_ARGS__); ... in dns.h
As this is a declaration in
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:08 PM, thomasg tho...@gstaedtner.net wrote:
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Vincent Torri vincent.to...@gmail.comwrote:
so it's a problem with clang. Fix your CC, then
Is it really?
dns_rr_foreach is defined as for (struct dns_rr_i DNS_PP_XPASTE(i,
__LINE__) =
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 12:57:39PM +0100, Vincent Torri wrote:
so it's a problem with clang. Fix your CC, then
Clang defaults to C99, so this should only happen if it was explicitly
instructed otherwise...
Joerg
--
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Vincent Torri vincent.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:08 PM, thomasg tho...@gstaedtner.net wrote:
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Vincent Torri
vincent.to...@gmail.comwrote:
so it's a problem with clang. Fix your CC, then
Is it really?
