Am Mon, 12 Jul 2010 21:57:35 +0200 schrieb Andreas Volz:
No reason? Or does simply no one know? Should I fix it to use the data
pointer?
regards
Andreas
Hello,
while porting the Elm GenList to C++ I found this code in
test_genlist.c:
static void
gl4_exp(void *data, Evas_Object
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Andreas Volz li...@brachttal.net wrote:
Am Mon, 12 Jul 2010 21:57:35 +0200 schrieb Andreas Volz:
No reason? Or does simply no one know? Should I fix it to use the data
pointer?
No, it should not use the data pointer. The data pointer is for user specific
data
Am Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:46:16 -0300 schrieb Iván Briano (Sachiel):
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Andreas Volz li...@brachttal.net
wrote:
Am Mon, 12 Jul 2010 21:57:35 +0200 schrieb Andreas Volz:
No reason? Or does simply no one know? Should I fix it to use the
data pointer?
No, it
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Andreas Volz li...@brachttal.net wrote:
Am Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:46:16 -0300 schrieb Iván Briano (Sachiel):
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Andreas Volz li...@brachttal.net
wrote:
Am Mon, 12 Jul 2010 21:57:35 +0200 schrieb Andreas Volz:
No reason? Or does
Hello,
while porting the Elm GenList to C++ I found this code in test_genlist.c:
static void
gl4_exp(void *data, Evas_Object *obj, void *event_info)
{
Elm_Genlist_Item *it = event_info;
Evas_Object *gl = elm_genlist_item_genlist_get(it);
int val = (int)elm_genlist_item_data_get(it);