On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 23:49:05 +0200 thomasg said:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:41 PM, Stephen okra Houston <
> smhousto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > okra pushed a commit to branch master.
> >
> > http://git.enlightenment.org/apps/ephoto.git/commit/?id=
> >
A compromise would be use XDG if "available" and then
.cache/ephoto/thumbnails rather than config and cache together as it does
at the moment.
One of my objections would be the existing location with ephoto config
togehter with cached data.
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 12:01 AM, Al Poole
Sorry I didn't give reasoning:
23:54 < thomasg> netstar: is there any actual reason why you dislike
supporting
xdg thumb, apart from you disliking freedesktop and linux
in
general?
23:54 < netstar> uh oh!
23:56 < netstar> they're not really thumbnails...
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:54 PM, Stephen Houston
wrote:
> The concern here with XDG is portability. Feel free to discuss. And go.
>
I understand that concern, but I don't think it is valid.
On linux freedesktop.org (XDG) standards are widely adhered to, and for
platforms
Just my two pence...
I reckon don't do that. Use:
$HOME/.cache/ephoto/thumbnails
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:54 PM, Stephen Houston
wrote:
> The concern here with XDG is portability. Feel free to discuss. And go.
>
> On Aug 22, 2016 4:49 PM, "thomasg"
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:41 PM, Stephen okra Houston <
smhousto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> okra pushed a commit to branch master.
>
> http://git.enlightenment.org/apps/ephoto.git/commit/?id=
> 813471f9bd6048026b372b4b55b303a311d4335e
>
> commit 813471f9bd6048026b372b4b55b303a311d4335e
> Author:
The concern here with XDG is portability. Feel free to discuss. And go.
On Aug 22, 2016 4:49 PM, "thomasg" wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:41 PM, Stephen okra Houston <
> smhousto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> okra pushed a commit to branch master.
>>
>>