On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 21:46, Christopher Michael
wrote:
> On 11/05/11 16:22, Boris Faure wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 20:34, Christopher Michael
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> What is the reasoning for this ?? Makes little sense to me to send a
>>> hide event for a border that is not visible (ie: not
On 11/05/11 16:22, Boris Faure wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 20:34, Christopher Michael
> wrote:
>> What is the reasoning for this ?? Makes little sense to me to send a
>> hide event for a border that is not visible (ie: not visible on screen
>> or already hidden). If the border is not visible
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 20:34, Christopher Michael
wrote:
> What is the reasoning for this ?? Makes little sense to me to send a
> hide event for a border that is not visible (ie: not visible on screen
> or already hidden). If the border is not visible on the screen (or
> already hidden), then why
On 11/05/11 14:29, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
> Log:
> e: send hide event for borders even if not visible
>
> Author: billiob
> Date: 2011-11-05 11:29:30 -0700 (Sat, 05 Nov 2011)
> New Revision: 64787
> Trac: http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/64787
>
> Modified:
>tru
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:21:58 +0200 Boris Faure said:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 04:23, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 12:11:08 -0700 "Enlightenment SVN"
> > said:
> >
> > you know... this is most annoying to keep seeing a folder called "1" appear
> > on the desktop. the reason w
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 04:23, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 12:11:08 -0700 "Enlightenment SVN"
> said:
>
> you know... this is most annoying to keep seeing a folder called "1" appear on
> the desktop. the reason we did Desktop-1 and soon before was.. so you would
> actually have
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 12:11:08 -0700 "Enlightenment SVN"
said:
you know... this is most annoying to keep seeing a folder called "1" appear on
the desktop. the reason we did Desktop-1 and soon before was.. so you would
actually have separate folders per screen and u didnt see these folders. if you
a
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 13:39, Sebastian Dransfeld wrote:
> On 04/03/2011 01:21 PM, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
>> Log:
>> e: fix E_INTERNAL use
>
> Pretty sure this is wrong. The gettext stuff should not be defined when
> not E_INTERNAL, else external modules will have wrong gettext setup.
Right, go
On 04/03/2011 01:21 PM, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
> Log:
> e: fix E_INTERNAL use
Pretty sure this is wrong. The gettext stuff should not be defined when
not E_INTERNAL, else external modules will have wrong gettext setup.
>
> Author: billiob
> Date: 2011-04-03 04:21:51 -0700 (Sun, 0
