On Monday 05 August 2013 18:23, Felipe Magno de Almeida wrote :
> Hello,
Hello,
>
> Is there any reason in eo2 why the eo wrapper function (the ones
> defined by EO2_FUNC_BODY et al) doesn't call the function directly,
> instead of registering it with Eo2_Op_Description. Which adds an
> unnecessa
Hello,
Is there any reason in eo2 why the eo wrapper function (the ones
defined by EO2_FUNC_BODY et al) doesn't call the function directly,
instead of registering it with Eo2_Op_Description. Which adds an
unnecessary indirection.
Also, I've been experimenting with changing Eo to make the class
in
On 02/08/13 02:42, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
>> what is the purpose of these hooks again,
>
> Improving our tooling. Right now there is at least a few tools that
> can use them :
> - espion, that does trace every call to elementary and ef
On 05/08/13 06:48, daniel.za...@samsung.com wrote:
> Hi Jeremy
>
> On 08/05/2013 02:12 AM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
>> On Sunday 04 August 2013 10:20, daniel.za...@samsung.com wrote :
>>> Hi Jeremy,
>> Hello Daniel
>>> On 08/02/2013 05:33 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
On Friday 02 August 2013 03:42
On 04/08/13 08:20, daniel.za...@samsung.com wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> On 08/02/2013 05:33 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
>> On Friday 02 August 2013 03:42, Cedric BAIL wrote :
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
what is the purpose of these hooks again,
>>> Impr
On Monday 05 August 2013 12:18, Cedric BAIL wrote :
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> > On Friday 02 August 2013 03:42, Cedric BAIL wrote :
> >> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> >> > these where my numbers beforeand
Hi Jeremy
On 08/05/2013 02:12 AM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> On Sunday 04 August 2013 10:20, daniel.za...@samsung.com wrote :
>> Hi Jeremy,
> Hello Daniel
>> On 08/02/2013 05:33 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
>>> On Friday 02 August 2013 03:42, Cedric BAIL wrote :
Hello,
On Thu, Aug 1, 20
Hello,
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> On Friday 02 August 2013 03:42, Cedric BAIL wrote :
>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
>> > these where my numbers beforeand now
>> >
>> > simple inc() - 9 calls
>> > calls/eo_do() EO
Hi Jeremy,
On 08/02/2013 05:33 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> On Friday 02 August 2013 03:42, Cedric BAIL wrote :
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
>>> what is the purpose of these hooks again,
>> Improving our tooling. Right now there is at least a few tools tha
On Friday 02 August 2013 03:42, Cedric BAIL wrote :
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> > what is the purpose of these hooks again,
>
> Improving our tooling. Right now there is at least a few tools that
> can use them :
> - espion, that does trace every call to
Hello,
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> what is the purpose of these hooks again,
Improving our tooling. Right now there is at least a few tools that
can use them :
- espion, that does trace every call to elementary and efl to rebuild
a fake application without the applica
Hi Cédric,
what is the purpose of these hooks again,
these where my numbers beforeand now
simple inc() - 9 calls
calls/eo_do() EO [ns]/call - EO2 [ns]/call - EO2 [ns]/call
#1 20 2529
#3 11 15
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> On Monday 29 July 2013 10:31, Lucas De Marchi wrote :
>> On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
>> > On Saturday 27 July 2013 11:10, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
>> >> On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:57:28 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
>> >>
On Monday 29 July 2013 16:03, Tom Hacohen wrote :
> On 29/07/13 16:04, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> > On Monday 29 July 2013 10:31, Lucas De Marchi wrote :
> >> On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> >>> On Saturday 27 July 2013 11:10, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
> On Fri, 26 Jul
On 29/07/13 16:04, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> On Monday 29 July 2013 10:31, Lucas De Marchi wrote :
>> On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
>>> On Saturday 27 July 2013 11:10, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:57:28 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
said:
> O
On Monday 29 July 2013 10:31, Lucas De Marchi wrote :
> On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> > On Saturday 27 July 2013 11:10, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
> >> On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:57:28 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
> >> said:
> >>
> >> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Carsten Hai
On 29/07/13 14:49, Felipe Magno de Almeida wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>> the con I could see is we loose validation in the caller, you'd need
>> to validate in the function... Example:
>> eo_do(evas_obj, ecore_timer_interval_set(1
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
[snip]
> the con I could see is we loose validation in the caller, you'd need
> to validate in the function... Example:
> eo_do(evas_obj, ecore_timer_interval_set(10.0));
> this would still call directly ecore_timer_interval_s
On 27/07/13 03:10, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:57:28 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
> said:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Carsten Haitzler
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:58:30 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
>>> said:
>>>
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:46
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Lucas De Marchi
wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
>> On Saturday 27 July 2013 11:10, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:57:28 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
>>> said:
>>>
>>> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Carsten Haitz
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Jul 2013 22:54:07 +0200 Jérémy Zurcher said:
>
>> On Saturday 27 July 2013 11:10, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
>> > On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:57:28 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
>> > said:
>> >
>> > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Carst
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> On Saturday 27 July 2013 11:10, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:57:28 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
>> said:
>>
>> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Carsten Haitzler
>> > wrote:
>> > > On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:58:30 -0300 Gustav
On Saturday 27 July 2013 21:02, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote :
> On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> > On Saturday 27 July 2013 11:10, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
> >> On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:57:28 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
> >> said:
> >>
> >> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:54 PM,
On Sat, 27 Jul 2013 22:54:07 +0200 Jérémy Zurcher said:
> On Saturday 27 July 2013 11:10, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
> > On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:57:28 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
> > said:
> >
> > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Carsten Haitzler
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:58:30 -03
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> On Saturday 27 July 2013 11:10, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:57:28 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
>> said:
>>
>> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Carsten Haitzler
>> > wrote:
>> > > On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:58:30 -0300 Gustav
On Saturday 27 July 2013 11:10, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:57:28 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
> said:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Carsten Haitzler
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:58:30 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> > > said:
> > >
> > >> On Thu, Jul 25, 20
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:57:28 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
said:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:58:30 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> > said:
> >
> >> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Tom Hacohen
> >> wrote:
> >> > On 24/07/13 03:09, Carsten Ha
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:58:30 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> said:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> > On 24/07/13 03:09, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 18:22:02 +0200 Jérémy
On 26/07/13 15:33, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 12:57:24 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
>
>> On 26/07/13 11:23, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:26:47 +0200 Raoul Hecky said:
>>>
Hi,
Le 26.07.2013 01:54, Carsten Haitzler a
On 26/07/13 15:33, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 12:57:24 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
>
>> On 26/07/13 11:23, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:26:47 +0200 Raoul Hecky said:
>>>
Hi,
Le 26.07.2013 01:54, Carsten Haitzler a
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 12:57:24 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
> On 26/07/13 11:23, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:26:47 +0200 Raoul Hecky said:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Le 26.07.2013 01:54, Carsten Haitzler a écrit :
> >>> On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:58:30 -0300 Gustavo Sverz
On 23/07/13 16:05, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>
> do {
> __VA_ARGS__ // (like we do now)
> } while (0);
> if (0)
> bla(__VA_ARGS__) // this will do the checking for us.
>
Actually, this wouldn't work. :( The problem is, some of the functions
in __VA_ARGS__ may return void, which will break things
On 26/07/13 11:23, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:26:47 +0200 Raoul Hecky said:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Le 26.07.2013 01:54, Carsten Haitzler a écrit :
>>> On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:58:30 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
>>> said:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Tom H
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:26:47 +0200 Raoul Hecky said:
> Hi,
>
> Le 26.07.2013 01:54, Carsten Haitzler a écrit :
> > On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:58:30 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> > said:
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Tom Hacohen
> > wrote:
> > > On 24/07/13 03:09, Carsten Haitzler (
Hi,
Le 26.07.2013 01:54, Carsten Haitzler a écrit :
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:58:30 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> said:
>
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Tom Hacohen
> wrote:
> > On 24/07/13 03:09, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> >> On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 18:22:02 +0200 Jérémy Zurc
On 25/07/13 18:58, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> On 24/07/13 03:09, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>> On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 18:22:02 +0200 Jérémy Zurcher said:
>>>
just to clarify a few points:
- I think the less ma
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:58:30 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> said:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> > On 24/07/13 03:09, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 18:22:02 +0200 Jérémy
Occurs to me Go language calls this "deferred", in it we could defer a call to
be called at every exit point.
Maybe there is an defer extension to compilers providing deferred calls in c?
--Gustavo
Sent from my iPhone
On 25/07/2013, at 20:54, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
wrote:
> On Thu
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:58:30 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
said:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> > On 24/07/13 03:09, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> >> On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 18:22:02 +0200 Jérémy Zurcher said:
> >>
> >>> just to clarify a few points:
> >>>
> >>
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 24/07/13 03:09, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>> On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 18:22:02 +0200 Jérémy Zurcher said:
>>
>>> just to clarify a few points:
>>>
>>> - I think the less macro we have in an eo class declaration the best,
>>>act
On 24/07/13 03:09, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 18:22:02 +0200 Jérémy Zurcher said:
>
>> just to clarify a few points:
>>
>> - I think the less macro we have in an eo class declaration the best,
>>actually we have nothing but that extra first parameter called e
On 23/07/13 17:04, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 July 2013 15:47, Tom Hacohen wrote :
>> On 12/07/13 07:42, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>> On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen
>>> said:
>>>
>>> ok. looked at eo2test.c
>>>
>>> eo2_do(obj,
>>>a = ins
On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 18:22:02 +0200 Jérémy Zurcher said:
> just to clarify a few points:
>
> - I think the less macro we have in an eo class declaration the best,
> actually we have nothing but that extra first parameter called eo2_o, wich
> is either an obj_ptr (devs/tasn/eo2) or a call_ctx
just to clarify a few points:
- I think the less macro we have in an eo class declaration the best,
actually we have nothing but that extra first parameter called eo2_o, wich
is either an obj_ptr (devs/tasn/eo2) or a call_ctx (devs/jeyzu/eo2)
this should go away if we use a stack per thread
On Tuesday 23 July 2013 15:47, Tom Hacohen wrote :
> On 12/07/13 07:42, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen
> > said:
> >
> > ok. looked at eo2test.c
> >
> > eo2_do(obj,
> > a = inst_func(eo_o, 32);
> > inst_func(eo_o
On 23/07/13 02:51, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Jul 2013 17:30:17 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
>
>> On 21/07/13 14:18, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
>>> Hello from my holiday in France (for the frenchies who know lofofora ;)
>>>
>>> On Friday 12 July 2013 15:42, Carsten Haitzler wrote
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 12/07/13 07:42, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>> On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen
>> said:
>>
>> ok. looked at eo2test.c
>>
>> eo2_do(obj,
>> a = inst_func(eo_o, 32);
>> inst_func(eo_o, 10);
On 12/07/13 07:42, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
>
> ok. looked at eo2test.c
>
> eo2_do(obj,
> a = inst_func(eo_o, 32);
> inst_func(eo_o, 10);
> b = inst_func(eo_o, 50);
> );
>
> first... p
On Mon, 22 Jul 2013 17:30:17 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
> On 21/07/13 14:18, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> > Hello from my holiday in France (for the frenchies who know lofofora ;)
> >
> > On Friday 12 July 2013 15:42, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
> >> On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen
> >> sai
On 21/07/13 14:18, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> Hello from my holiday in France (for the frenchies who know lofofora ;)
>
> On Friday 12 July 2013 15:42, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
>> On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen
>> said:
>>
>> ok. looked at eo2test.c
>>
>> eo2_do(obj,
>>
On 18/07/13 03:00, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 15:10:45 +0100 Tom Hacohen
>> said:
>>> On 17/07/13 15:04, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
On 07/17/2013 02:07 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 16/07/13 09:02, Cedric BAIL wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jul 2013 10:24:03 +0900 Cedric BAIL said:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 21 Jul 2013 15:18:02 +0200 Jérémy Zurcher said:
> >> Hello from my holiday in France (for the frenchies who know lofofora ;)
>
> Enjoy !
>
> >> On Friday 12 July 2013
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Jul 2013 15:18:02 +0200 Jérémy Zurcher said:
>> Hello from my holiday in France (for the frenchies who know lofofora ;)
Enjoy !
>> On Friday 12 July 2013 15:42, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
>> > On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +010
On Sun, 21 Jul 2013 15:18:02 +0200 Jérémy Zurcher said:
> Hello from my holiday in France (for the frenchies who know lofofora ;)
>
> On Friday 12 July 2013 15:42, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
> > On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen
> > said:
> >
> > ok. looked at eo2test.c
> >
> >
Hello from my holiday in France (for the frenchies who know lofofora ;)
On Friday 12 July 2013 15:42, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
> On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
>
> ok. looked at eo2test.c
>
>eo2_do(obj,
> a = inst_func(eo_o, 32);
> inst_func(eo_o, 10
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 15:10:45 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
>> On 17/07/13 15:04, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>> > On 07/17/2013 02:07 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> >> On 16/07/13 09:02, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>> >>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Stefan Sc
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 15:10:45 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
> On 17/07/13 15:04, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > On 07/17/2013 02:07 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> >> On 16/07/13 09:02, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Stefan Schmidt
> >> wrote:
>
> Before the efl
On 17/07/13 15:04, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 07/17/2013 02:07 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> On 16/07/13 09:02, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Stefan Schmidt
>> wrote:
Before the efl merge and the git move Daniel and myself played around
with what we
Hello.
On 07/17/2013 02:07 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 16/07/13 09:02, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Stefan Schmidt
> wrote:
>>>
>>> Before the efl merge and the git move Daniel and myself played around
>>> with what we already had in svn and made it work again. Should be
On 16/07/13 09:02, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>> On 07/16/2013 12:58 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Tom Hacohen
>>> wrote:
On 09/07/13 04:09, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Tom Hacohen
>
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:07:14 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 08:58:15 +0900 Cedric BAIL
> said:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Tom Hacohen
> > wrote:
> > > On 09/07/13 04:09, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:00 AM,
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> On 07/16/2013 12:58 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Tom Hacohen
>> wrote:
>>> On 09/07/13 04:09, Cedric BAIL wrote:
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Tom Hacohen
> >>>
Eo is one of the biggest change we
Hello.
On 07/16/2013 12:58 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Tom Hacohen
> wrote:
>> On 09/07/13 04:09, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Tom Hacohen
>>>
>>> Eo is one of the biggest change we did for 1.8. At this stage it is
>>> optimized to a po
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 08:58:15 +0900 Cedric BAIL said:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> > On 09/07/13 04:09, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Tom Hacohen
...
> >> That lead to an equivalent question, how many people have yet reviewed
> >>
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 09/07/13 04:09, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>>> The hero Jeremy Zurcher has been playing around and looking for ways to
>>> improve Eo and address all the issues that have been raised by
On 09/07/13 04:09, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> The hero Jeremy Zurcher has been playing around and looking for ways to
>> improve Eo and address all the issues that have been raised by everyone.
>> We revisited some old ideas, tried some ne
On 10/07/13 11:00, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
>> On Wednesday 10 July 2013 16:41, Cedric BAIL wrote :
>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
On Tuesday 09 July 2013 13:40, Tom Hacohen wrote :
> On 09/07/13 03:55, Cars
On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
ok. looked at eo2test.c
eo2_do(obj,
a = inst_func(eo_o, 32);
inst_func(eo_o, 10);
b = inst_func(eo_o, 50);
);
first... passing in eo_o... should probably go away. ie
eo2_do(obj,
a = inst_fun
Hello,
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> On Thursday 11 July 2013 19:11, Cedric BAIL wrote :
>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
>> > On Thursday 11 July 2013 03:28, Cedric BAIL wrote :
>> >> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
>
On Thursday 11 July 2013 19:11, Cedric BAIL wrote :
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> > On Thursday 11 July 2013 03:28, Cedric BAIL wrote :
> >> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> >> > still not fully functional,
> >> >
> >> > here is the concept:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> On Thursday 11 July 2013 03:28, Cedric BAIL wrote :
>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
>> > still not fully functional,
>> >
>> > here is the concept:
>> >
>> > - enhance const Eo_Op_Description *descs; in Eo_Clas
On Thursday 11 July 2013 03:28, Cedric BAIL wrote :
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> > still not fully functional,
> >
> > here is the concept:
> >
> > - enhance const Eo_Op_Description *descs; in Eo_Class_Description into:
> >
> > typedef struct _Eo_Op_Description
sorry the thread is broken, I forgot to synk the mailbox when leaving
the office, btw here are my numbers from afdb8f3
gcc (GCC) 4.8.1
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E7500 @2.93GHz
64 bits
with -g -ggdb3 -O3
Signal/Basic Tests: OK
Signal/CollectorVector: OK
Signal/CollectorUntil0: OK
Signal/Collect
Hi,
could you have a look at devs/jeyzu/eo2
the last commit propose something to solve the func as OP issue,
it just needs Eo_Op_Description to be replaced with a new struct,
so for now it just calls op 0 all the time.
--- Hell'O from Yverdoom
Jérémy (jeyzu)
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 July 2013 16:41, Cedric BAIL wrote :
>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
>> > On Tuesday 09 July 2013 13:40, Tom Hacohen wrote :
>> >> On 09/07/13 03:55, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>> >>
On Wednesday 10 July 2013 16:41, Cedric BAIL wrote :
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> > On Tuesday 09 July 2013 13:40, Tom Hacohen wrote :
> >> On 09/07/13 03:55, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen
> >> > said
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 July 2013 13:40, Tom Hacohen wrote :
>> On 09/07/13 03:55, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>> > On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen
>> > said:
>> >
>> >> Hey guys,
>> >>
>> >> The hero Jeremy Zurcher has b
On 09/07/13 15:08, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 July 2013 13:40, Tom Hacohen wrote :
>> On 09/07/13 03:55, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>> On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen
>>> said:
>>>
Hey guys,
The hero Jeremy Zurcher has been playing around an
On Tuesday 09 July 2013 13:40, Tom Hacohen wrote :
> On 09/07/13 03:55, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen
> > said:
> >
> >> Hey guys,
> >>
> >> The hero Jeremy Zurcher has been playing around and looking for ways to
> >> improve Eo and ad
On 09/07/13 03:55, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
>
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> The hero Jeremy Zurcher has been playing around and looking for ways to
>> improve Eo and address all the issues that have been raised by everyone.
>> We revisited
On Tuesday 09 July 2013 12:09, Cedric BAIL wrote :
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> > The hero Jeremy Zurcher has been playing around and looking for ways to
> > improve Eo and address all the issues that have been raised by everyone.
> > We revisited some old id
On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
> Hey guys,
>
> The hero Jeremy Zurcher has been playing around and looking for ways to
> improve Eo and address all the issues that have been raised by everyone.
> We revisited some old ideas, tried some new ideas and changed our
> comprom
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> The hero Jeremy Zurcher has been playing around and looking for ways to
> improve Eo and address all the issues that have been raised by everyone.
> We revisited some old ideas, tried some new ideas and changed our
> compromises and pref
On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
> Hey guys,
>
> The hero Jeremy Zurcher has been playing around and looking for ways to
> improve Eo and address all the issues that have been raised by everyone.
> We revisited some old ideas, tried some new ideas and changed our
> comprom
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> forgot to git-daemon-export-ok?
> http://git.enlightenment.org/devs/tasn/eo2.git = no repositories found
>
You can find it on the core efl repository in devs/tasn/eo2 branch.
>
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
forgot to git-daemon-export-ok?
http://git.enlightenment.org/devs/tasn/eo2.git = no repositories found
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> The hero Jeremy Zurcher has been playing around and looking for ways to
> improve Eo and address all the issues that have bee
86 matches
Mail list logo
